On Monday 09 March 2009, Kyungmin Park wrote:
+++ b/common/Makefile
@@ -98,6 +98,7 @@ COBJS-$(CONFIG_CMD_IMMAP) += cmd_immap.o
COBJS-$(CONFIG_CMD_IRQ) += cmd_irq.o
COBJS-$(CONFIG_CMD_ITEST) += cmd_itest.o
COBJS-$(CONFIG_CMD_JFFS2) += cmd_jffs2.o
+COBJS-$(CONFIG_JFFS2_CMDLINE) +=
On 09:14 Mon 09 Mar , Stefan Roese wrote:
On Monday 09 March 2009, Kyungmin Park wrote:
+++ b/common/Makefile
@@ -98,6 +98,7 @@ COBJS-$(CONFIG_CMD_IMMAP) += cmd_immap.o
COBJS-$(CONFIG_CMD_IRQ) += cmd_irq.o
COBJS-$(CONFIG_CMD_ITEST) += cmd_itest.o
COBJS-$(CONFIG_CMD_JFFS2) +=
Hi Jean-Christophe,
On Monday 09 March 2009, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
On 09:14 Mon 09 Mar , Stefan Roese wrote:
On Monday 09 March 2009, Kyungmin Park wrote:
+++ b/common/Makefile
@@ -98,6 +98,7 @@ COBJS-$(CONFIG_CMD_IMMAP) += cmd_immap.o
COBJS-$(CONFIG_CMD_IRQ)
On 10:52 Mon 09 Mar , Stefan Roese wrote:
Hi Jean-Christophe,
On Monday 09 March 2009, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
On 09:14 Mon 09 Mar , Stefan Roese wrote:
On Monday 09 March 2009, Kyungmin Park wrote:
+++ b/common/Makefile
@@ -98,6 +98,7 @@
Dear Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD,
In message 20090309102044.gi24...@game.jcrosoft.org you wrote:
Hmm. Now I'm a little confused. It seems that you added this patch with some
changes to the for-next branch of your arm git repository. Did you post
the
changed version of this patch on
On 10:22 Mon 09 Mar , Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
On 09:14 Mon 09 Mar , Stefan Roese wrote:
On Monday 09 March 2009, Kyungmin Park wrote:
+++ b/common/Makefile
@@ -98,6 +98,7 @@ COBJS-$(CONFIG_CMD_IMMAP) += cmd_immap.o
COBJS-$(CONFIG_CMD_IRQ) += cmd_irq.o
Dear Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD,
In message 20090309201334.ge20...@game.jcrosoft.org you wrote:
Is it? I have not seen such a patch. Do you have a link? (I added
Jean-Christophe to CC).
http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot/u-boot-arm.git;a=commit;h=9163868e5575d841089a84d97f287b2ca15486a1
Dear Stefan Roese,
In message 200903061413.50906...@denx.de you wrote:
COBJS-$(CONFIG_CMD_IRQ) += cmd_irq.o
COBJS-$(CONFIG_CMD_ITEST) += cmd_itest.o
COBJS-$(CONFIG_CMD_JFFS2) += cmd_jffs2.o
+COBJS-$(CONFIG_JFFS2_CMDLINE) += cmd_mtdparts.o
Shouldn't we change this define
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 10:13 PM, Stefan Roese s...@denx.de wrote:
Hi Kyungmin,
On Tuesday 03 March 2009, Kyungmin Park wrote:
Some program such as UBI only used the mtdpart only.
however current jffs2 cmdline has dependent with jffs2 cmd
This patch make a build only jffs2 cmdline without
Hi Kyungmin,
On Tuesday 03 March 2009, Kyungmin Park wrote:
Some program such as UBI only used the mtdpart only.
however current jffs2 cmdline has dependent with jffs2 cmd
This patch make a build only jffs2 cmdline without jffs2 cmd dependency.
I tried to rephrase this description a little
On Tuesday 03 March 2009, Kyungmin Park wrote:
Some program such as UBI only used the mtdpart only.
however current jffs2 cmdline has dependent with jffs2 cmd
This patch make a build only jffs2 cmdline without jffs2 cmd dependency.
Thanks. I'll review it in a few days.
Best regards,
Stefan
11 matches
Mail list logo