s-paul...@ti.com wrote:
From: Sandeep Paulraj s-paul...@ti.com
In the DaVinci specific code, we use both CONFIG_SOC_DM646X and
CONFIG_SOC_DM646x to represent DM646x specific code.
This patch changes occurrences of CONFIG_SOC_DM646x to
CONFIG_SOC_DM646X. This is because for DM644x series of
s-paul...@ti.com wrote:
From: Sandeep Paulraj s-paul...@ti.com
In the DaVinci specific code, we use both CONFIG_SOC_DM646X and
CONFIG_SOC_DM646x to represent DM646x specific code.
This patch changes occurrences of CONFIG_SOC_DM646x to
CONFIG_SOC_DM646X. This is because for DM644x
From: Sandeep Paulraj s-paul...@ti.com
In the DaVinci specific code, we use both CONFIG_SOC_DM646X and
CONFIG_SOC_DM646x to represent DM646x specific code.
This patch changes occurrences of CONFIG_SOC_DM646x to
CONFIG_SOC_DM646X. This is because for DM644x series of SOCs we use
the flag
3 matches
Mail list logo