Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] TI: DaVinci: DM646x: Update flag used to represent DM646x SOC's

2009-09-21 Thread Tom
s-paul...@ti.com wrote: From: Sandeep Paulraj s-paul...@ti.com In the DaVinci specific code, we use both CONFIG_SOC_DM646X and CONFIG_SOC_DM646x to represent DM646x specific code. This patch changes occurrences of CONFIG_SOC_DM646x to CONFIG_SOC_DM646X. This is because for DM644x series of

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] TI: DaVinci: DM646x: Update flag used to represent DM646x SOC's

2009-09-21 Thread Paulraj, Sandeep
s-paul...@ti.com wrote: From: Sandeep Paulraj s-paul...@ti.com In the DaVinci specific code, we use both CONFIG_SOC_DM646X and CONFIG_SOC_DM646x to represent DM646x specific code. This patch changes occurrences of CONFIG_SOC_DM646x to CONFIG_SOC_DM646X. This is because for DM644x

[U-Boot] [PATCH] TI: DaVinci: DM646x: Update flag used to represent DM646x SOC's

2009-09-18 Thread s-paulraj
From: Sandeep Paulraj s-paul...@ti.com In the DaVinci specific code, we use both CONFIG_SOC_DM646X and CONFIG_SOC_DM646x to represent DM646x specific code. This patch changes occurrences of CONFIG_SOC_DM646x to CONFIG_SOC_DM646X. This is because for DM644x series of SOCs we use the flag