Dear Olof Johansson,
In message 20090911204750.ga22...@lixom.net you wrote:
Add setup for ethernet on Tobi, allowing kernel/ramdisk to be loaded
over tftp.
Based on the omap3 evm code. I added a new highlevel define for Tobi
to avoid having it dependent on CMD_NET (which would seem backward
Dear Paulraj, Sandeep,
In message 0554bef07d437848af01b9c9b5f0bc5d92708...@dlee01.ent.ti.com you
wrote:
Olof Johansson wrote:
Add setup for ethernet on Tobi, allowing kernel/ramdisk to be loaded
over tftp.
Based on the omap3 evm code. I added a new highlevel define for Tobi
to
Dear Olof Johansson,
In message cae3d950-824b-47dd-a9e3-d090ac081...@lixom.net you wrote:
Random question on u-boot development process: I see you didn't add
your signed-off on the commit. People don't do that when they check in
patches to the u-boot trees?
No, we don't do this if we
Dear Ben Warren,
In message f8328f7c0909131022t700abe65p5083bdc3c4630...@mail.gmail.com you
wrote:
I always use 'git am -s', which adds the SOB. My understanding is that
maintainers should do this as an indication of approval and help in
traceability.
Please feel free to do that, but I
Dear Paulraj, Sandeep,
In message 0554bef07d437848af01b9c9b5f0bc5d91e07...@dlee01.ent.ti.com you
wrote:
I always use 'git am -s', which adds the SOB. My understanding is that
maintainers should do this as an indication of approval and help in
traceability.
OK Thanks. Shall do so
On Sep 22, 2009, at 2:48 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Olof Johansson,
In message cae3d950-824b-47dd-a9e3-d090ac081...@lixom.net you wrote:
Random question on u-boot development process: I see you didn't add
your signed-off on the commit. People don't do that when they check
in
patches
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 09:41:42PM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Please use git format-patch / git send-email to create and submit
patches. For example, it is always nice to see a file statistics in
the patch.
k.
+ MUX_VAL(CP(GPMC_CLK), (IDIS | PTU | EN | M0)) /*GPMC_CLK*/\
+
On Sep 22, 2009, at 2:50 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Ben Warren,
In message f8328f7c0909131022t700abe65p5083bdc3c4630...@mail.gmail.com
you wrote:
I always use 'git am -s', which adds the SOB. My understanding
is that
maintainers should do this as an indication of approval and
Dear Olof Johansson,
In message c6505381-97ac-4e05-9cca-6089f6996...@gmail.com you wrote:
Please feel free to do that, but I consider this just adding
line-noise, unless you _really_ express special approval.
Which sense would it make if I added a s-o-b to each and every commit
I'm
Dear Olof Johansson,
In message 3c828e04-9cb1-4ccf-ad61-904f8956f...@gmail.com you wrote:
Linus does not S-o-b all patches that go into the Linux kernel, or
does he?
He does.
No, he does not.
For example, see
On Sep 22, 2009, at 4:28 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Olof Johansson,
In message c6505381-97ac-4e05-9cca-6089f6996...@gmail.com you wrote:
Please feel free to do that, but I consider this just adding
line-noise, unless you _really_ express special approval.
Which sense would it make if
On Sep 22, 2009, at 4:32 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
56327c2a58b76291616f15c9c84a180cf7049645
committer Jaswinder Singh Rajput jaswinderraj...@gmail.com
Sun, 20 Sep 2009 10:32:20 + (15:32 +0530)
He didn't commit it.
-Olof
___
U-Boot mailing
Dear Olof Johansson,
In message 20090922203431.ga14...@lixom.net you wrote:
+ MUX_VAL(CP(GPMC_CLK), (IDIS | PTU | EN | M0)) /*GPMC_CLK*/\
+ MUX_VAL(CP(GPMC_WAIT2), (IEN | PTU | EN | M4)) /*GPIO_64*/\
+ /* - SMSC911X_NRES*/\
On Sep 22, 2009, at 4:34 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Olof Johansson,
In message 20090922203431.ga14...@lixom.net you wrote:
+ MUX_VAL(CP(GPMC_CLK),(IDIS | PTU | EN | M0)) /*GPMC_CLK*/\
+ MUX_VAL(CP(GPMC_WAIT2), (IEN | PTU | EN | M4)) /*GPIO_64*/\
+
Dear Olof Johansson,
In message fbc6adc7-d76b-4186-9e13-889041453...@gmail.com you wrote:
I guess you don't see what the difference between applying a patch and
pulling a tree is.
Indeed I don't. Isn't pulling a tree the same as applying a number of
patches using soem highly efficient
Dear Olof Johansson,
In message 00aa7a76-7fe3-440e-acbb-0d7fdcd4c...@gmail.com you wrote:
On Sep 22, 2009, at 4:32 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
56327c2a58b76291616f15c9c84a180cf7049645
committer Jaswinder Singh Rajput jaswinderraj...@gmail.com
Sun, 20 Sep 2009 10:32:20 + (15:32
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Olof Johansson,
In message cae3d950-824b-47dd-a9e3-d090ac081...@lixom.net you wrote:
Random question on u-boot development process: I see you didn't add
your signed-off on the commit. People don't do that when they check in
patches to the u-boot trees?
No,
Dear Olof Johansson,
In message cc2dd232-01b8-4587-ad41-e6f2d9b2c...@lixom.net you wrote:
No, please submit a new version which also incorporates the cleanup
patches by Dirk.
I didn't see those, since I wasn't cc:d.
See the ML archive, then.
I will not pull the current version.
So
On Sep 22, 2009, at 4:49 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Olof Johansson,
In message cc2dd232-01b8-4587-ad41-e6f2d9b2c...@lixom.net you wrote:
No, please submit a new version which also incorporates the cleanup
patches by Dirk.
I didn't see those, since I wasn't cc:d.
See the ML archive,
Wolfgang Denk a écrit :
Dear Olof Johansson,
In message 3c828e04-9cb1-4ccf-ad61-904f8956f...@gmail.com you wrote:
Linus does not S-o-b all patches that go into the Linux kernel, or
does he?
He does.
No, he does not.
Maybe not so off-tropic, Linus have talked precisely about that today:
On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 10:33 AM, Paulraj, Sandeep s-paul...@ti.com wrote:
Olof Johansson wrote:
Add setup for ethernet on Tobi, allowing kernel/ramdisk to be loaded
over tftp.
Based on the omap3 evm code. I added a new highlevel define for Tobi
to avoid having it dependent
I always use 'git am -s', which adds the SOB. My understanding is that
maintainers should do this as an indication of approval and help in
traceability.
regards,
Ben
OK Thanks. Shall do so henceforth.
Regards,
Sandeep
___
U-Boot mailing
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 1:47 PM, Olof Johansson o...@lixom.net wrote:
Add setup for ethernet on Tobi, allowing kernel/ramdisk to be loaded
over tftp.
Based on the omap3 evm code. I added a new highlevel define for Tobi
to avoid having it dependent on CMD_NET (which would seem backward in
Olof Johansson wrote:
Add setup for ethernet on Tobi, allowing kernel/ramdisk to be loaded
over tftp.
Based on the omap3 evm code. I added a new highlevel define for Tobi
to avoid having it dependent on CMD_NET (which would seem backward in
this case).
Signed-off-by: Olof
Olof Johansson wrote:
Add setup for ethernet on Tobi, allowing kernel/ramdisk to be loaded
over tftp.
Based on the omap3 evm code. I added a new highlevel define for Tobi
to avoid having it dependent on CMD_NET (which would seem backward
in
this case).
Signed-off-by: Olof
On Sep 12, 2009, at 10:16 AM, Paulraj, Sandeep wrote:
Olof Johansson wrote:
Add setup for ethernet on Tobi, allowing kernel/ramdisk to be loaded
over tftp.
Based on the omap3 evm code. I added a new highlevel define for Tobi
to avoid having it dependent on CMD_NET (which would seem backward
Add setup for ethernet on Tobi, allowing kernel/ramdisk to be loaded
over tftp.
Based on the omap3 evm code. I added a new highlevel define for Tobi
to avoid having it dependent on CMD_NET (which would seem backward in
this case).
Signed-off-by: Olof Johansson o...@lixom.net
diff --git
Olof Johansson wrote:
Add setup for ethernet on Tobi, allowing kernel/ramdisk to be loaded
over tftp.
Based on the omap3 evm code. I added a new highlevel define for Tobi
to avoid having it dependent on CMD_NET (which would seem backward in
this case).
Signed-off-by: Olof Johansson
28 matches
Mail list logo
