Hi Rob and all,
Am Dienstag, den 05.06.2012, 12:42 -0600 schrieb Stephen Warren:
On 06/05/2012 11:47 AM, Lucas Stach wrote:
Recent toolchains default to using the hardware feature for
unaligned access on ARM v7, rather than doing the software
fallback. According to ARM this is safe as all
On 06/22/2012 04:15 AM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Hi Lucas,
On Tue, 05 Jun 2012 21:06:20 +0200, Lucas Stach d...@lynxeye.de wrote:
Hi Stephen,
Am Dienstag, den 05.06.2012, 12:42 -0600 schrieb Stephen Warren:
On 06/05/2012 11:47 AM, Lucas Stach wrote:
Recent toolchains default to using the
Hi Aneesh,
BTW, I agree that enabling un-aligned access is not a bad idea.
Just being not a bad idea is not enough for me to accept this. It
will have to be the sole sound solution to a problem, and at this
point, I do not think it is as far as USB structure mis-alignement
issues are
Hi Albert,
Am Montag, den 25.06.2012, 22:17 +0200 schrieb Albert ARIBAUD:
Hi Lucas,
On Sun, 24 Jun 2012 08:30:19 +0200, Lucas Stach d...@lynxeye.de wrote:
Hi Albert,
Am Samstag, den 23.06.2012, 11:01 +0200 schrieb Albert ARIBAUD:
[snip]
But apart from this, we certainly have
Hi Albert,
On 06/25/2012 01:34 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Hi Aneesh,
BTW, I agree that enabling un-aligned access is not a bad idea.
Just being not a bad idea is not enough for me to accept this. It
will have to be the sole sound solution to a problem, and at this
point, I do not think it is
Dear Aneesh V,
In message 4fe8dce7.7090...@ti.com you wrote:
What is the (non-contrived) problem to which allowing mis-aligned
accesses would be a solution?
memcpy() when there is a mismatch in the alignment of source and
destination buffers. Let's say the source buffer is 4 byte
Hi Albert,
Am Samstag, den 23.06.2012, 11:01 +0200 schrieb Albert ARIBAUD:
[snip]
But apart from this, we certainly have situations where we have
unaligned accesses that are justified and could not be removed.
[...]
I cannot see how enabling a hardware feature can be seen as
Hi Aneesh,
On Fri, 22 Jun 2012 15:13:39 -0700, Aneesh V ane...@ti.com wrote:
On 06/22/2012 03:11 PM, Aneesh V wrote:
+Tom
Hi Lucas,
On 06/22/2012 04:47 AM, Lucas Stach wrote:
Hi Albert,
Am Freitag, den 22.06.2012, 13:16 +0200 schrieb Albert ARIBAUD:
I am not too happy with
Hi Albert,
On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 2:01 AM, Albert ARIBAUD
albert.u.b...@aribaud.net wrote:
Hi Aneesh,
On Fri, 22 Jun 2012 15:13:39 -0700, Aneesh V ane...@ti.com wrote:
On 06/22/2012 03:11 PM, Aneesh V wrote:
+Tom
Hi Lucas,
On 06/22/2012 04:47 AM, Lucas Stach wrote:
Hi Albert,
Albert ARIBAUD albert.u.b...@aribaud.net writes:
I cannot see how enabling a hardware feature can be seen as
allowing of lax behaviour. As some of the USB structs are used to
access hardware registers, we can not align every struct there.
If the access is in true RAM, then we can always
Hi Lucas,
On Tue, 05 Jun 2012 21:06:20 +0200, Lucas Stach d...@lynxeye.de wrote:
Hi Stephen,
Am Dienstag, den 05.06.2012, 12:42 -0600 schrieb Stephen Warren:
On 06/05/2012 11:47 AM, Lucas Stach wrote:
Recent toolchains default to using the hardware feature for
unaligned access on ARM
Am Freitag, den 22.06.2012, 11:15 +0200 schrieb Albert ARIBAUD:
Hi Lucas,
On Tue, 05 Jun 2012 21:06:20 +0200, Lucas Stach d...@lynxeye.de wrote:
Hi Stephen,
Am Dienstag, den 05.06.2012, 12:42 -0600 schrieb Stephen Warren:
On 06/05/2012 11:47 AM, Lucas Stach wrote:
Recent
Hi Lucas,
Linux in particular does reinitialize this state and I expect any
reasonable OS to do so.
Then what is the point of enabling it on U-Boot? Does it fix some
issue whereby some mis-aligned piece of data cannot be properly
aligned?
Yes, it fixes U-Boot USB on Tegra, when
Hi Albert,
Am Freitag, den 22.06.2012, 13:16 +0200 schrieb Albert ARIBAUD:
Hi Lucas,
Linux in particular does reinitialize this state and I expect any
reasonable OS to do so.
Then what is the point of enabling it on U-Boot? Does it fix some
issue whereby some mis-aligned
+Tom
Hi Lucas,
On 06/22/2012 04:47 AM, Lucas Stach wrote:
Hi Albert,
Am Freitag, den 22.06.2012, 13:16 +0200 schrieb Albert ARIBAUD:
Hi Lucas,
Linux in particular does reinitialize this state and I expect any
reasonable OS to do so.
Then what is the point of enabling it on U-Boot? Does
On 06/22/2012 03:11 PM, Aneesh V wrote:
+Tom
Hi Lucas,
On 06/22/2012 04:47 AM, Lucas Stach wrote:
Hi Albert,
Am Freitag, den 22.06.2012, 13:16 +0200 schrieb Albert ARIBAUD:
Hi Lucas,
Linux in particular does reinitialize this state and I expect any
reasonable OS to do so.
Then what is
Recent toolchains default to using the hardware feature for unaligned access on
ARM v7, rather than doing the software fallback. According to ARM this is safe
as all v7 implementations have to support this feature.
On 06/05/2012 11:47 AM, Lucas Stach wrote:
Recent toolchains default to using the hardware feature for unaligned access
on
ARM v7, rather than doing the software fallback. According to ARM this is safe
as all v7 implementations have to support this feature.
Hi Stephen,
Am Dienstag, den 05.06.2012, 12:42 -0600 schrieb Stephen Warren:
On 06/05/2012 11:47 AM, Lucas Stach wrote:
Recent toolchains default to using the hardware feature for unaligned
access on
ARM v7, rather than doing the software fallback. According to ARM this is
safe
as
19 matches
Mail list logo
