On Jul 29, 2009, at 12:47 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Scott,
In message 20090728225244.ga8...@b07421-ec1.am.freescale.net you
wrote:
The patch title is bad -- it's not disabling warnings, it's
disabling an
aspect of C99 that the code is incompatible with (and which is pretty
On Jul 29, 2009, at 12:47 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Scott,
In message 20090728225244.ga8...@b07421-ec1.am.freescale.net you
wrote:
The patch title is bad -- it's not disabling warnings, it's
disabling an
aspect of C99 that the code is incompatible with (and which is pretty
On Wed, 2009-07-29 at 07:47 +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Scott,
In message 20090728225244.ga8...@b07421-ec1.am.freescale.net you wrote:
The patch title is bad -- it's not disabling warnings, it's disabling an
aspect of C99 that the code is incompatible with (and which is pretty
On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 11:26:18PM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Kenneth Johansson,
In message 1248453626.8967.27.ca...@localhost.localdomain you wrote:
Well, if you think fixing the problems is paper taping over the
issue, then how do you call NOT fixing the problems and shutting
Dear Scott,
In message 20090728225244.ga8...@b07421-ec1.am.freescale.net you wrote:
The patch title is bad -- it's not disabling warnings, it's disabling an
aspect of C99 that the code is incompatible with (and which is pretty
questionable in the first place with such low level code). Note
Dear Kenneth Johansson,
In message 1248453626.8967.27.ca...@localhost.localdomain you wrote:
Well, if you think fixing the problems is paper taping over the
issue, then how do you call NOT fixing the problems and shutting off
the warnings?
Well he removed the optimization so the problem
On Thu, 2009-07-23 at 21:06 +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Kumar Gala,
In message 1247495041-8605-3-git-send-email-ga...@kernel.crashing.org you
wrote:
The version of dlmalloc we are using generates a fair number of warnings
of the following form:
warning: dereferencing pointer
Dear Kumar Gala,
In message 1247495041-8605-3-git-send-email-ga...@kernel.crashing.org you
wrote:
The version of dlmalloc we are using generates a fair number of warnings
of the following form:
warning: dereferencing pointer '({anonymous})' does break strict-aliasing
rules
Trying to
The version of dlmalloc we are using generates a fair number of warnings
of the following form:
warning: dereferencing pointer '({anonymous})' does break strict-aliasing rules
Trying to fix these is just paper taping over the issue and we really
just need to look into a new malloc
9 matches
Mail list logo
