On 10/26/2017 03:33 AM, Ashish Kumar wrote:
> Correcting error handing for qbman_swp_acquire. The return value is zero is
> an error condition since number of buffer copied is zero meaning
> there are no free buffers for allocation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ashish Kumar
>
Please see inline.
-Original Message-
From: York Sun
Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2017 12:32 AM
To: Ashish Kumar ; Roy Pledge
Cc: joe.hershber...@gmail.com; Prabhakar Kushwaha ;
u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: Re:
On 10/29/2017 10:23 PM, Ashish Kumar wrote:
> Hello York,
>
> The definition of qbman_swp_acquire(), is not owned by u-boot, it is part of
> qbman drivers which is owned by Roy.
> u-boot gets this definition from flib code and same is used in u-boot as it
> is.
>
> So, moving this error
Hello York,
The definition of qbman_swp_acquire(), is not owned by u-boot, it is part of
qbman drivers which is owned by Roy.
u-boot gets this definition from flib code and same is used in u-boot as it is.
So, moving this error handler in qbman_swp_acquire for num == 0, may result in
On 10/26/2017 03:33 AM, Ashish Kumar wrote:
> Correcting error handing for qbman_swp_acquire. The return value is zero is
> an error condition since number of buffer copied is zero meaning
> there are no free buffers for allocation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ashish Kumar
>
Correcting error handing for qbman_swp_acquire. The return value is zero is
an error condition since number of buffer copied is zero meaning
there are no free buffers for allocation.
Signed-off-by: Ashish Kumar
Signed-off-by: Kushwaha Prabhakar
---
6 matches
Mail list logo