On 26.01.19 10:31, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> On 1/25/19 10:43 PM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>> On Fri, 25 Jan 2019 at 19:21, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
>>>
>>> On 1/23/19 6:33 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
While discussing something compeltely different, Ard pointed out
that it might be
On 1/25/19 10:43 PM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Jan 2019 at 19:21, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
>>
>> On 1/23/19 6:33 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>> While discussing something compeltely different, Ard pointed out
>>> that it might be legal to omit calling SetVirtualAddressMap altogether.
On Fri, 25 Jan 2019 at 19:21, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
>
> On 1/23/19 6:33 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
> > While discussing something compeltely different, Ard pointed out
> > that it might be legal to omit calling SetVirtualAddressMap altogether.
> >
> > While that sounds great, we currently
On 1/23/19 6:33 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
> While discussing something compeltely different, Ard pointed out
> that it might be legal to omit calling SetVirtualAddressMap altogether.
>
> While that sounds great, we currently rely on that call to remove
> all function pointers to code that we do
While discussing something compeltely different, Ard pointed out
that it might be legal to omit calling SetVirtualAddressMap altogether.
While that sounds great, we currently rely on that call to remove
all function pointers to code that we do not support outside of
boot services.
So let's patch
5 matches
Mail list logo
