On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 10:15 AM, Stefan Roese wrote:
> On 21.09.2016 17:12, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>
>> On 09/20/2016 07:17 PM, Paul Burton wrote:
>>>
>>> Commit bac17b78dace ("image-fit: switch ENOLINK to ENOENT") changed
>>> fit_get_node_from_config to return -ENOENT when a property doesn't
>>> ex
On 21.09.2016 17:12, Marek Vasut wrote:
On 09/20/2016 07:17 PM, Paul Burton wrote:
Commit bac17b78dace ("image-fit: switch ENOLINK to ENOENT") changed
fit_get_node_from_config to return -ENOENT when a property doesn't
exist, but didn't change any of its callers which check return values.
Notably
On 09/20/2016 07:17 PM, Paul Burton wrote:
> Commit bac17b78dace ("image-fit: switch ENOLINK to ENOENT") changed
> fit_get_node_from_config to return -ENOENT when a property doesn't
> exist, but didn't change any of its callers which check return values.
> Notably it didn't change boot_get_ramdisk,
Commit bac17b78dace ("image-fit: switch ENOLINK to ENOENT") changed
fit_get_node_from_config to return -ENOENT when a property doesn't
exist, but didn't change any of its callers which check return values.
Notably it didn't change boot_get_ramdisk, which leads to U-Boot failing
to boot FIT images w
4 matches
Mail list logo