-Original Message-
From: Timur Tabi [mailto:ti...@tabi.org]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2013 11:09 PM
To: Liu Shengzhou-B36685
Cc: U-Boot Mailing List; sun york-R58495
Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] powerpc/eeprom: update MAX_NUM_PORTS to fix
program failure
Actually, the 23
On 08/30/2013 06:04 AM, Liu Shengzhou-B36685 wrote:
Actually, the 23 should be changed to 31. York, this patch needs to be
applied: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/170753/
According to AN3638, it should be 30 rather than 31 for 256-bytes EEPROM.
Are you talking about the C struct?
-Original Message-
From: Timur Tabi [mailto:ti...@tabi.org]
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2013 7:51 AM
To: Liu Shengzhou-B36685
Cc: U-Boot Mailing List; sun york-R58495
Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] powerpc/eeprom: update MAX_NUM_PORTS to fix
program failure
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 5
On 08/29/2013 04:56 AM, Liu Shengzhou-B36685 wrote:
If the EEPROM is 128 bytes, then you have a non-conformant EEPROM.
What is a conformant EEPROM?
A conformant EEPROM has a size of 256 bytes .
The size of struct of EEPROM_NXID should be able to conform to real size of
EEPROM, regardless
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 5:14 AM, Shengzhou Liu
shengzhou@freescale.com wrote:
On some boards, the size of EEPROM is 128 Bytes instead of 256.
so we set default MAX_NUM_PORTS to 9 rather than previous 23 to
avoid the programming failure, we can define MAX_NUM_PORTS in
board-specific header
On some boards, the size of EEPROM is 128 Bytes instead of 256.
so we set default MAX_NUM_PORTS to 9 rather than previous 23 to
avoid the programming failure, we can define MAX_NUM_PORTS in
board-specific header file to overwrite the default value.
Signed-off-by: Shengzhou Liu
6 matches
Mail list logo
