Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] sf: Correct data types in stm_is_locked_sr()

On 12 March 2016 at 20:07, Jagan Teki wrote: > Hi Marek, > > On 12 March 2016 at 00:29, Marek Vasut wrote: >> On 03/11/2016 07:44 PM, Jagan Teki wrote: >>> On 12 March 2016 at 00:03, Marek Vasut wrote: On 03/11/2016 07:07 PM, Jagan

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] sf: Correct data types in stm_is_locked_sr()

Hi Marek, On 12 March 2016 at 00:29, Marek Vasut wrote: > On 03/11/2016 07:44 PM, Jagan Teki wrote: >> On 12 March 2016 at 00:03, Marek Vasut wrote: >>> On 03/11/2016 07:07 PM, Jagan Teki wrote: On 11 March 2016 at 23:32, Marek Vasut wrote:

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] sf: Correct data types in stm_is_locked_sr()

Hi Albert, On 12 March 2016 at 01:04, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > Hello Jagan, > > On Sat, 12 Mar 2016 00:41:25 +0530, Jagan Teki > wrote: >> Hi Albert, >> >> On 12 March 2016 at 00:17, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: >> > Hello

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] sf: Correct data types in stm_is_locked_sr()

Hello Jagan, On Sat, 12 Mar 2016 00:41:25 +0530, Jagan Teki wrote: > Hi Albert, > > On 12 March 2016 at 00:17, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > > Hello Jagan, > > > > On Fri, 11 Mar 2016 12:09:37 +0530, Jagan Teki > >

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] sf: Correct data types in stm_is_locked_sr()

Hi Albert, On 12 March 2016 at 00:17, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > Hello Jagan, > > On Fri, 11 Mar 2016 12:09:37 +0530, Jagan Teki > wrote: >> On 11 March 2016 at 07:50, Marek Vasut wrote: >> > The stm_is_locked_sr() function is

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] sf: Correct data types in stm_is_locked_sr()

Hello Jagan, On Fri, 11 Mar 2016 12:09:37 +0530, Jagan Teki wrote: > On 11 March 2016 at 07:50, Marek Vasut wrote: > > The stm_is_locked_sr() function is picked from Linux kernel. For reason > > unknown, the 64bit data types used by the function and

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] sf: Correct data types in stm_is_locked_sr()

On 03/11/2016 07:44 PM, Jagan Teki wrote: > On 12 March 2016 at 00:03, Marek Vasut wrote: >> On 03/11/2016 07:07 PM, Jagan Teki wrote: >>> On 11 March 2016 at 23:32, Marek Vasut wrote: On 03/11/2016 06:34 PM, Jagan Teki wrote: > On 11 March 2016 at 17:59,

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] sf: Correct data types in stm_is_locked_sr()

On 12 March 2016 at 00:03, Marek Vasut wrote: > On 03/11/2016 07:07 PM, Jagan Teki wrote: >> On 11 March 2016 at 23:32, Marek Vasut wrote: >>> On 03/11/2016 06:34 PM, Jagan Teki wrote: On 11 March 2016 at 17:59, Marek Vasut wrote: > On

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] sf: Correct data types in stm_is_locked_sr()

On 03/11/2016 07:07 PM, Jagan Teki wrote: > On 11 March 2016 at 23:32, Marek Vasut wrote: >> On 03/11/2016 06:34 PM, Jagan Teki wrote: >>> On 11 March 2016 at 17:59, Marek Vasut wrote: On 03/11/2016 07:39 AM, Jagan Teki wrote: > On 11 March 2016 at 07:50,

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] sf: Correct data types in stm_is_locked_sr()

On 11 March 2016 at 23:32, Marek Vasut wrote: > On 03/11/2016 06:34 PM, Jagan Teki wrote: >> On 11 March 2016 at 17:59, Marek Vasut wrote: >>> On 03/11/2016 07:39 AM, Jagan Teki wrote: On 11 March 2016 at 07:50, Marek Vasut wrote: > The

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] sf: Correct data types in stm_is_locked_sr()

On 03/11/2016 06:34 PM, Jagan Teki wrote: > On 11 March 2016 at 17:59, Marek Vasut wrote: >> On 03/11/2016 07:39 AM, Jagan Teki wrote: >>> On 11 March 2016 at 07:50, Marek Vasut wrote: The stm_is_locked_sr() function is picked from Linux kernel. For reason

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] sf: Correct data types in stm_is_locked_sr()

On 11 March 2016 at 17:59, Marek Vasut wrote: > On 03/11/2016 07:39 AM, Jagan Teki wrote: >> On 11 March 2016 at 07:50, Marek Vasut wrote: >>> The stm_is_locked_sr() function is picked from Linux kernel. For reason >>> unknown, the 64bit data types used by the

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] sf: Correct data types in stm_is_locked_sr()

On 03/11/2016 07:39 AM, Jagan Teki wrote: > On 11 March 2016 at 07:50, Marek Vasut wrote: >> The stm_is_locked_sr() function is picked from Linux kernel. For reason >> unknown, the 64bit data types used by the function and present in Linux >> were replaced with 32bit unsigned ones,

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] sf: Correct data types in stm_is_locked_sr()

On 11 March 2016 at 07:50, Marek Vasut wrote: > The stm_is_locked_sr() function is picked from Linux kernel. For reason > unknown, the 64bit data types used by the function and present in Linux > were replaced with 32bit unsigned ones, which causes trouble. > > The testcase

[U-Boot] [PATCH] sf: Correct data types in stm_is_locked_sr()

The stm_is_locked_sr() function is picked from Linux kernel. For reason unknown, the 64bit data types used by the function and present in Linux were replaced with 32bit unsigned ones, which causes trouble. The testcase performed was done using ST M25P80 chip. The command used was: => sf protect