Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] smc911x MII made available

2011-06-30 Thread Luca Ceresoli
Hi Helmut, helmut.rai...@hale.at wrote: From: Helmut Raigerhelmut.rai...@hale.at The driver already had the MII functions, but they have not been registered using miiphy_register(). Signed-off-by: Helmut Raigerhelmut.rai...@hale.at [...] I implemented in the past, but never found the time

[U-Boot] [PATCH] smc911x MII made available

2011-06-29 Thread helmut . raiger
From: Helmut Raiger helmut.rai...@hale.at The driver already had the MII functions, but they have not been registered using miiphy_register(). Signed-off-by: Helmut Raiger helmut.rai...@hale.at --- drivers/net/smc911x.c | 36 ++-- 1 files changed, 30

[U-Boot] [PATCH] smc911x MII made available

2011-06-27 Thread helmut . raiger
From: Helmut Raiger helmut.rai...@hale.at The driver already had the MII functions, but they have not been registered using miiphy_register(). --- drivers/net/smc911x.c | 24 1 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/smc911x.c

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] smc911x MII made available

2011-06-27 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Monday, June 27, 2011 03:22:03 helmut.rai...@hale.at wrote: From: Helmut Raiger helmut.rai...@hale.at The driver already had the MII functions, but they have not been registered using miiphy_register(). missing signed-off-by tag +static int mii_phy_read(char *devname, u8 phy, u8 reg,