On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 03:46:15PM +0100, Giulio Benetti wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> +Stefano B.
>
> On 1/16/20 3:40 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 05:18:20PM +0100, Giulio Benetti wrote:
> >
> > > At the moment entry_point is set to image_get_load(header) that sets it
> > > to "load
Hi Tom,
+Stefano B.
On 1/16/20 3:40 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 05:18:20PM +0100, Giulio Benetti wrote:
At the moment entry_point is set to image_get_load(header) that sets it
to "load address" instead of "entry point", assuming entry_point is
equal to load_addr, but it's not
On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 05:18:20PM +0100, Giulio Benetti wrote:
> At the moment entry_point is set to image_get_load(header) that sets it
> to "load address" instead of "entry point", assuming entry_point is
> equal to load_addr, but it's not true. Then load_addr is set to
> "entry_point -
On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 03:57:47PM +0100, Giulio Benetti wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> On 12/7/19 10:28 PM, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
> > Hi Tom,
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 6, 2019 at 3:55 PM Tom Rini wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Dec 06, 2019 at 03:05:55PM +0100, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Dec 6,
Hi All,
On 12/7/19 10:28 PM, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
Hi Tom,
On Fri, Dec 6, 2019 at 3:55 PM Tom Rini wrote:
On Fri, Dec 06, 2019 at 03:05:55PM +0100, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
On Fri, Dec 6, 2019 at 2:49 PM Giulio Benetti
wrote:
Hello Tom, all,
On 12/6/19 2:34 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
On
Hi Tom,
On Fri, Dec 6, 2019 at 3:55 PM Tom Rini wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 06, 2019 at 03:05:55PM +0100, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 6, 2019 at 2:49 PM Giulio Benetti
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello Tom, all,
> > >
> > > On 12/6/19 2:34 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Dec 06, 2019 at
Hi Patrice,
On 12/6/19 3:04 PM, Patrice CHOTARD wrote:
So probably broken boards try to jump to absolute 0.
A solving patch would be:
ifndef CONFIG_SYS_UBOOT_START
CONFIG_SYS_UBOOT_START := CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE
endif
What do you think?
This is what i implemented to fix this issue. Here is my
On Fri, Dec 06, 2019 at 03:05:55PM +0100, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 6, 2019 at 2:49 PM Giulio Benetti
> wrote:
> >
> > Hello Tom, all,
> >
> > On 12/6/19 2:34 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> > > On Fri, Dec 06, 2019 at 01:58:46PM +0100, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
> > >> On Fri, Dec 6, 2019 at
On Fri, Dec 6, 2019 at 2:49 PM Giulio Benetti
wrote:
>
> Hello Tom, all,
>
> On 12/6/19 2:34 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 06, 2019 at 01:58:46PM +0100, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
> >> On Fri, Dec 6, 2019 at 1:46 PM Patrice CHOTARD
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi
> >>>
> >>> This patch is
Hi All
On 12/6/19 2:48 PM, Giulio Benetti wrote:
> Hello Tom, all,
>
> On 12/6/19 2:34 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 06, 2019 at 01:58:46PM +0100, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
>>> On Fri, Dec 6, 2019 at 1:46 PM Patrice CHOTARD
>>> wrote:
Hi
This patch is breaking the
Hello Tom, all,
On 12/6/19 2:34 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
On Fri, Dec 06, 2019 at 01:58:46PM +0100, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
On Fri, Dec 6, 2019 at 1:46 PM Patrice CHOTARD wrote:
Hi
This patch is breaking the STM32MP15 basic boot (spl => u-boot).
Looking at socfpga gen5 u-boot.img, this is
On Fri, Dec 06, 2019 at 02:37:52PM +0100, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 6, 2019 at 2:34 PM Tom Rini wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 06, 2019 at 01:58:46PM +0100, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
> > > On Fri, Dec 6, 2019 at 1:46 PM Patrice CHOTARD
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi
> > > >
> > > >
On Fri, Dec 6, 2019 at 2:34 PM Tom Rini wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 06, 2019 at 01:58:46PM +0100, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 6, 2019 at 1:46 PM Patrice CHOTARD
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > This patch is breaking the STM32MP15 basic boot (spl => u-boot).
> >
> > Looking at
On Fri, Dec 06, 2019 at 01:58:46PM +0100, Simon Goldschmidt wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 6, 2019 at 1:46 PM Patrice CHOTARD wrote:
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > This patch is breaking the STM32MP15 basic boot (spl => u-boot).
>
> Looking at socfpga gen5 u-boot.img, this is probably broken as well.
>
> And I don't
On Fri, Dec 6, 2019 at 1:46 PM Patrice CHOTARD wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> This patch is breaking the STM32MP15 basic boot (spl => u-boot).
Looking at socfpga gen5 u-boot.img, this is probably broken as well.
And I don't even see any RB or TB tags here :-(
Regards,
Simon
>
> I will send a fix proposal.
Hi
This patch is breaking the STM32MP15 basic boot (spl => u-boot).
I will send a fix proposal.
Thanks
Patrice
On 12/5/19 11:09 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 05:18:20PM +0100, Giulio Benetti wrote:
>
>> At the moment entry_point is set to image_get_load(header) that sets it
>>
On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 05:18:20PM +0100, Giulio Benetti wrote:
> At the moment entry_point is set to image_get_load(header) that sets it
> to "load address" instead of "entry point", assuming entry_point is
> equal to load_addr, but it's not true. Then load_addr is set to
> "entry_point -
At the moment entry_point is set to image_get_load(header) that sets it
to "load address" instead of "entry point", assuming entry_point is
equal to load_addr, but it's not true. Then load_addr is set to
"entry_point - header_size", but this is wrong too since load_addr is
not an entry point.
So
18 matches
Mail list logo