Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] sunxi: use CONFIG_DEFAULT_FDT_FILE everywhere

2018-06-11 Thread Martin Kelly
(ping Jagan) On 06/06/2018 10:51 AM, Martin Kelly wrote: On 06/06/2018 07:58 AM, Maxime Ripard wrote: On Mon, Jun 04, 2018 at 11:15:34AM -0700, Martin Kelly wrote: [snip as the thread is getting long] On 06/04/2018 01:21 AM, Maxime Ripard wrote: On Fri, Jun 01, 2018 at 10:16:32AM -0700,

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] sunxi: use CONFIG_DEFAULT_FDT_FILE everywhere

2018-06-06 Thread Martin Kelly
On 06/06/2018 07:58 AM, Maxime Ripard wrote: On Mon, Jun 04, 2018 at 11:15:34AM -0700, Martin Kelly wrote: [snip as the thread is getting long] On 06/04/2018 01:21 AM, Maxime Ripard wrote: On Fri, Jun 01, 2018 at 10:16:32AM -0700, Martin Kelly wrote: On 06/01/2018 04:05 AM, Maxime Ripard

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] sunxi: use CONFIG_DEFAULT_FDT_FILE everywhere

2018-06-06 Thread Maxime Ripard
On Mon, Jun 04, 2018 at 11:15:34AM -0700, Martin Kelly wrote: > [snip as the thread is getting long] > > On 06/04/2018 01:21 AM, Maxime Ripard wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 01, 2018 at 10:16:32AM -0700, Martin Kelly wrote: > > > On 06/01/2018 04:05 AM, Maxime Ripard wrote: > > > > > > I can see the

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] sunxi: use CONFIG_DEFAULT_FDT_FILE everywhere

2018-06-04 Thread Martin Kelly
[snip as the thread is getting long] On 06/04/2018 01:21 AM, Maxime Ripard wrote: On Fri, Jun 01, 2018 at 10:16:32AM -0700, Martin Kelly wrote: On 06/01/2018 04:05 AM, Maxime Ripard wrote: I can see the issues with new defconfigs, but I'm not sure if it will really be that bad. If we apply

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] sunxi: use CONFIG_DEFAULT_FDT_FILE everywhere

2018-06-04 Thread Maxime Ripard
On Fri, Jun 01, 2018 at 10:16:32AM -0700, Martin Kelly wrote: > On 06/01/2018 04:05 AM, Maxime Ripard wrote: > > On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 05:59:16PM -0700, Martin Kelly wrote: > > > Currently, sunxi-common.h ignores CONFIG_DEFAULT_FDT_FILE and assumes > > > the kernel fdtfile and the u-boot

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] sunxi: use CONFIG_DEFAULT_FDT_FILE everywhere

2018-06-01 Thread Martin Kelly
On 06/01/2018 04:05 AM, Maxime Ripard wrote: On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 05:59:16PM -0700, Martin Kelly wrote: Currently, sunxi-common.h ignores CONFIG_DEFAULT_FDT_FILE and assumes the kernel fdtfile and the u-boot devicetree names are the same. Although this is typically the case, sometimes you

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] sunxi: use CONFIG_DEFAULT_FDT_FILE everywhere

2018-06-01 Thread Martin Kelly
On 05/31/2018 07:45 PM, klaus.go...@theobroma-systems.com wrote: On 01.06.2018, at 02:59, Martin Kelly wrote: Currently, sunxi-common.h ignores CONFIG_DEFAULT_FDT_FILE and assumes the kernel fdtfile and the u-boot devicetree names are the same. Although this is typically the case, sometimes

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] sunxi: use CONFIG_DEFAULT_FDT_FILE everywhere

2018-06-01 Thread Maxime Ripard
On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 05:59:16PM -0700, Martin Kelly wrote: > Currently, sunxi-common.h ignores CONFIG_DEFAULT_FDT_FILE and assumes > the kernel fdtfile and the u-boot devicetree names are the same. > Although this is typically the case, sometimes you might want to > customize one of these

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] sunxi: use CONFIG_DEFAULT_FDT_FILE everywhere

2018-05-31 Thread klaus . goger
> On 01.06.2018, at 02:59, Martin Kelly wrote: > > Currently, sunxi-common.h ignores CONFIG_DEFAULT_FDT_FILE and assumes > the kernel fdtfile and the u-boot devicetree names are the same. > Although this is typically the case, sometimes you might want to > customize one of these differently,

[U-Boot] [PATCH] sunxi: use CONFIG_DEFAULT_FDT_FILE everywhere

2018-05-31 Thread Martin Kelly
Currently, sunxi-common.h ignores CONFIG_DEFAULT_FDT_FILE and assumes the kernel fdtfile and the u-boot devicetree names are the same. Although this is typically the case, sometimes you might want to customize one of these differently, so it's useful to allow them to be different. Fix this to use