On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 06:45:58AM +, Sumit Garg wrote:
> Hi Teddy,
>
> Can you please rebase this patch on upstream?
>
> Tom,
>
> I have sent patches [1] and [2] upstream which are dependent on this patch.
> Also I have to add support for spl verified boot on our ARM based platforms
> whi
Hi Teddy,
On 28 May 2016 at 18:58, Teddy Reed wrote:
> This allows a board to configure verified boot within the SPL using
> a FIT or FIT with external data. It also allows the SPL to perform
> signature verification without needing relocation.
>
> The board configuration will need to add the fol
On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 09:36:18AM -0700, Teddy Reed wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 11:45 PM, Sumit Garg wrote:
> > Hi Teddy,
> >
> > Can you please rebase this patch on upstream?
>
> Sure! If there are any changes needed I can send a new patch version
> by EOD and will CC you.
Hi Teddy,
Yes it
On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 11:45 PM, Sumit Garg wrote:
> Hi Teddy,
>
> Can you please rebase this patch on upstream?
Sure! If there are any changes needed I can send a new patch version
by EOD and will CC you.
>
> Tom,
>
> I have sent patches [1] and [2] upstream which are dependent on this patch.
Hi Teddy,
Can you please rebase this patch on upstream?
Tom,
I have sent patches [1] and [2] upstream which are dependent on this patch.
Also I have to add support for spl verified boot on our ARM based platforms
which also have dependency on this patch.
So my work is being affected, can you
> -Original Message-
> From: Teddy Reed [mailto:teddy.r...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, June 06, 2016 2:58 AM
> To: Sumit Garg
> Cc: s...@chromium.org; dannenb...@ti.com; u-boot@lists.denx.de; Ruchika
> Gupta ; Aneesh Bansal ;
> york sun
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] verified-boot: Minimal support
On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 9:40 PM, Sumit Garg wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Teddy Reed [mailto:teddy.r...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2016 2:23 AM
>> To: Sumit Garg
>> Cc: s...@chromium.org; dannenb...@ti.com; u-boot@lists.denx.de; Ruchika
>> Gupta ; Aneesh Bansal
>> Subjec
> -Original Message-
> From: Teddy Reed [mailto:teddy.r...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2016 2:23 AM
> To: Sumit Garg
> Cc: s...@chromium.org; dannenb...@ti.com; u-boot@lists.denx.de; Ruchika
> Gupta ; Aneesh Bansal
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] verified-boot: Minimal support for booting
Hi Sumit!
On Sun, May 29, 2016 at 10:32 PM, Sumit Garg wrote:
> Can you make this support more generic as you have used only
> CONFIG_SPL_FIT_SIGNATURE for SPL verified boot while our platforms doesn't
> use fit signature approach for verification?
>
CONFIG_SPL_FIT_SIGNATURE only adds ./lib/rs
Can you make this support more generic as you have used only
CONFIG_SPL_FIT_SIGNATURE for SPL verified boot while our platforms doesn't use
fit signature approach for verification?
May be you can use CONFIG_SPL_VERIFIED_BOOT?
> -Original Message-
> From: Teddy Reed [mailto:teddy.r...@gm
This allows a board to configure verified boot within the SPL using
a FIT or FIT with external data. It also allows the SPL to perform
signature verification without needing relocation.
The board configuration will need to add the following feature defines:
CONFIG_SPL_CRYPTO_SUPPORT
CONFIG_SPL_HAS
11 matches
Mail list logo
