Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/4] No GOT in IRQ and use r12 as GOT ptr

2010-01-17 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Joakim Tjernlund, In message ofde68ea42.2e6b3c0a-onc12576a3.0050d905-c12576a3.00510...@transmode.se you wrote: Has this been forgotten(again)? Jocke This series removes the needs to access the GOT in IRQ handlers, then switches GOT PTR in start.S asm to use r12 instead of r14.

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/4] No GOT in IRQ and use r12 as GOT ptr

2010-01-17 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote on 17/01/2010 20:12:31: Dear Joakim Tjernlund, In message OFDE68EA42.2E6B3C0A-ONC12576A3.0050D905-C12576A3. 00510...@transmode.se you wrote: Has this been forgotten(again)? Jocke This series removes the needs to access the GOT in IRQ handlers,

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/4] No GOT in IRQ and use r12 as GOT ptr

2010-01-17 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Joakim Tjernlund, In message of40260f27.b5c57b54-onc12576ae.00740cd3-c12576ae.00742...@transmode.se you wrote: Not really forgotten. Actually I was waiting for a resend - I thought these patches were still RFC. I can't apply them as is, as the Signed-off-by: line is missing in

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/4] No GOT in IRQ and use r12 as GOT ptr

2010-01-06 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
Has this been forgotten(again)? Jocke This series removes the needs to access the GOT in IRQ handlers, then switches GOT PTR in start.S asm to use r12 instead of r14. This leads up to the removal of -ffixed-r14 gcc option for ppc This is a resend since the it seems like the series was

[U-Boot] [PATCH 0/4] No GOT in IRQ and use r12 as GOT ptr

2009-12-30 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
This series removes the needs to access the GOT in IRQ handlers, then switches GOT PTR in start.S asm to use r12 instead of r14. This leads up to the removal of -ffixed-r14 gcc option for ppc This is a resend since the it seems like the series was lost Joakim Tjernlund (3): ppc: Loose GOT