Hi Igor,
On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 07:58:51PM +0300, Igor Opaniuk wrote:
> Hi Eugeniu,
>
> You're totally right regarding avb internal headers, they all
> should remain in lib/libavb.
> v2 patchset (planning to send it by the end of this week) will
> include these changes you're talking about (+ wi
Hi Eugeniu,
You're totally right regarding avb internal headers, they all
should remain in lib/libavb.
v2 patchset (planning to send it by the end of this week) will
include these changes you're talking about (+ will include libavb
updates from [1]).
> My final question is what's your opinion abo
On Sun, May 06, 2018 at 01:31:18PM +0200, Eugeniu Rosca wrote:
> Hello Igor, Alex, Kever,
>
> I wonder if it would be possible to keep the internal libavb headers in
> lib/libavb (similar to how it's done by NXP in [4]), since this would
> allow not rewriting the original include paths for such he
Hello Igor, Alex, Kever,
Having these patches in mainline would be great, as this would reduce
the delta between our own and community U-boot trees. After having a
quick look at this series, I have some questions/review findings.
These patches appear to be slightly older than what is available in
Hi Alex,
I've replaced licence texts in source file headers to SPDX short
identifiers (suggestion from Tom Rini).
As far as I know that was the only one major change I introduced to
libavb/libavb_ab.
I also did remove crc32() implementation and used existing in U-boot
because of licence ambiguity,
Hi Kever,
libavb and libavb_ab are different things, and we split them for a
reason. Adding libavb is great, but you don't need to add libavb_ab as an
A/B implementation. The boot_android command referenced by Igor doesn't use
that as an A/B implementation, but uses the structs already defined in
On 26 April 2018 at 06:05, Kever Yang wrote:
> Hi Igor,
>
> It's great to see the patch set to support AVB2.0, the upstream
> libavb(from aosp) combine the AVB with A/B which I think should be
> two separate feature, are you going to split them?
Hi Kever,
Right, support of verification of A/
Hi Igor,
It's great to see the patch set to support AVB2.0, the upstream
libavb(from aosp) combine the AVB with A/B which I think should be
two separate feature, are you going to split them?
BTW, do you have plan to update boot_android cmd to support avb?
the command is too weak for use n
This series of patches introduces support of Android Verified Boot 2.0,
which provides integrity checking of Android partitions on MMC.
It integrates libavb/libavb_ab into the U-boot, provides implementation of
AvbOps, subset of `avb` commands to run verification chain (and for debugging
purposes)
9 matches
Mail list logo
