Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 00/11] sunxi: arm64 binary size fixes

2018-01-05 Thread Jagan Teki
On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 3:30 PM, Maxime Ripard wrote: > On Thu, Jan 04, 2018 at 10:58:16AM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote: >> Maxime, >> >> On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 6:10 PM, Maxime Ripard >> wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > As we discussed

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 00/11] sunxi: arm64 binary size fixes

2018-01-05 Thread Maxime Ripard
On Thu, Jan 04, 2018 at 10:58:16AM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote: > Maxime, > > On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 6:10 PM, Maxime Ripard > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > As we discussed already, this is the list of options that we will need > > to disable by default. > > > > I also

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 00/11] sunxi: arm64 binary size fixes

2018-01-03 Thread Jagan Teki
Maxime, On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 6:10 PM, Maxime Ripard wrote: > Hi, > > As we discussed already, this is the list of options that we will need > to disable by default. > > I also added to the mix a size check, which even though it's not > really optimal, is

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 00/11] sunxi: arm64 binary size fixes

2017-12-21 Thread Tom Rini
On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 01:40:19PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote: > Hi, > > As we discussed already, this is the list of options that we will need > to disable by default. > > I also added to the mix a size check, which even though it's not > really optimal, is temporary and will be removed in a

[U-Boot] [PATCH 00/11] sunxi: arm64 binary size fixes

2017-12-21 Thread Maxime Ripard
Hi, As we discussed already, this is the list of options that we will need to disable by default. I also added to the mix a size check, which even though it's not really optimal, is temporary and will be removed in a future (and hopefully close) release. Tom, is this still something we can