Dear Holger Brunck,
In message 4dbe77c1.7020...@keymile.com you wrote:
the SDRAM configuration is different to mgcoge. And the CFI flash on
mgcoge has
a dual die in a single chip and therefore e.g.CONFIG_SYS_MAX_FLASH_BANKS is
different to mgcoge3ne.
OK, but these can trivially be
Hello,
On 04/30/2011 10:05 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Valentin Longchamp,
In message
c5ba4fd44d7260d169b924ddda97c4a4c7460dd5.1302272395.git.valentin.longch...@keymile.com
you wrote:
From: Holger Brunck holger.bru...@keymile.com
This patch rename mgcoge2ne board support to
Dear Holger Brunck,
In message 4dbe6962.1010...@keymile.com you wrote:
the SDRAM configuration is different to mgcoge. And the CFI flash on mgcoge
has
a dual die in a single chip and therefore e.g.CONFIG_SYS_MAX_FLASH_BANKS is
different to mgcoge3ne.
OK, but these can trivially be handled
On 05/02/2011 10:42 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Holger Brunck,
In message 4dbe6962.1010...@keymile.com you wrote:
the SDRAM configuration is different to mgcoge. And the CFI flash on mgcoge
has
a dual die in a single chip and therefore e.g.CONFIG_SYS_MAX_FLASH_BANKS is
different to
Dear Valentin Longchamp,
In message
c5ba4fd44d7260d169b924ddda97c4a4c7460dd5.1302272395.git.valentin.longch...@keymile.com
you wrote:
From: Holger Brunck holger.bru...@keymile.com
This patch rename mgcoge2ne board support to mgcoge3ne.
The board is similar to mgcoge. The difference is that
From: Holger Brunck holger.bru...@keymile.com
This patch rename mgcoge2ne board support to mgcoge3ne.
The board is similar to mgcoge. The difference is that
a NUMONYX flash is used and a larger SDRAM (256MB).
Also introduce CONFIG_KM_82XX to collect ppc82xx common
settings.
Signed-off-by: Holger
6 matches
Mail list logo
