Now that we have %pD support in vsprintf we should avoid separate
logic for printing device paths in other places.

Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.g...@gmx.de>
---
 lib/efi_loader/efi_bootmgr.c | 6 ++----
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/efi_loader/efi_bootmgr.c b/lib/efi_loader/efi_bootmgr.c
index 857d88a879..c96b9d48c5 100644
--- a/lib/efi_loader/efi_bootmgr.c
+++ b/lib/efi_loader/efi_bootmgr.c
@@ -120,11 +120,9 @@ static void *try_load_entry(uint16_t n, struct 
efi_device_path **device_path,
 
        if (lo.attributes & LOAD_OPTION_ACTIVE) {
                efi_status_t ret;
-               u16 *str = NULL;
 
-               debug("%s: trying to load \"%ls\" from: %ls\n", __func__,
-                     lo.label, (str = efi_dp_str(lo.file_path)));
-               efi_free_pool(str);
+               debug("%s: trying to load \"%ls\" from %pD\n",
+                     __func__, lo.label, lo.file_path);
 
                ret = efi_load_image_from_path(lo.file_path, &image);
 
-- 
2.15.1

_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to