Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/1] test: provide unit test for memory functions

2019-01-31 Thread Simon Glass
On Tue, 29 Jan 2019 at 23:53, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: > > Memory functions may have architecture specific implementations. These > should be tested. > > Provide unit tests for memset(), memcpy(), memmove(). > > Provide a 'ut lib' sub-command to execute the tests. > > Signed-off-by: Heinrich Sch

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/1] test: provide unit test for memory functions

2019-01-29 Thread Heinrich Schuchardt
Memory functions may have architecture specific implementations. These should be tested. Provide unit tests for memset(), memcpy(), memmove(). Provide a 'ut lib' sub-command to execute the tests. Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt --- v2 vary alignment and length of copied or set memory

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/1] test: provide unit test for memory functions

2019-01-24 Thread Heinrich Schuchardt
On 1/24/19 9:03 AM, Simon Goldschmidt wrote: > On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 7:51 AM Heinrich Schuchardt > wrote: >> >> Memory functions may have architecture specific implementations. These >> should be tested. >> >> Provide unit tests for memset(), memcpy(), memmove(). >> >> Signed-off-by: Heinrich

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/1] test: provide unit test for memory functions

2019-01-24 Thread Simon Goldschmidt
On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 7:51 AM Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: > > Memory functions may have architecture specific implementations. These > should be tested. > > Provide unit tests for memset(), memcpy(), memmove(). > > Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt Could you explain to me the changes to the fi

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/1] test: provide unit test for memory functions

2019-01-23 Thread Heinrich Schuchardt
Memory functions may have architecture specific implementations. These should be tested. Provide unit tests for memset(), memcpy(), memmove(). Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt --- Hello Alex, you already picked up the patch correcting memmove for x86_64. x86: do not use i386 code for x86_64 m