Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] 85xx: seperate PIXIS virtual from physical address

2008-12-02 Thread Becky Bruce
On Dec 2, 2008, at 4:36 PM, Kumar Gala wrote: > > On Dec 2, 2008, at 2:29 PM, Jon Loeliger wrote: > >> On Tue, 2008-12-02 at 14:19 -0600, Kumar Gala wrote: >>> Added a PIXIS_BASE_PHYS for use as the physical address and maintain >>> PIXIS_BASE as the virtual address of the PIXIS fpga registers. >

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] 85xx: seperate PIXIS virtual from physical address

2008-12-02 Thread Kumar Gala
On Dec 2, 2008, at 2:29 PM, Jon Loeliger wrote: > On Tue, 2008-12-02 at 14:19 -0600, Kumar Gala wrote: >> Added a PIXIS_BASE_PHYS for use as the physical address and maintain >> PIXIS_BASE as the virtual address of the PIXIS fpga registers. >> >> This allows us to deal with 36-bit phys on these b

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] 85xx: seperate PIXIS virtual from physical address

2008-12-02 Thread Jon Loeliger
On Tue, 2008-12-02 at 14:19 -0600, Kumar Gala wrote: > Added a PIXIS_BASE_PHYS for use as the physical address and maintain > PIXIS_BASE as the virtual address of the PIXIS fpga registers. > > This allows us to deal with 36-bit phys on these boards in the future. > > Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <[E

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] 85xx: seperate PIXIS virtual from physical address

2008-12-02 Thread Kumar Gala
Added a PIXIS_BASE_PHYS for use as the physical address and maintain PIXIS_BASE as the virtual address of the PIXIS fpga registers. This allows us to deal with 36-bit phys on these boards in the future. Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- These require the 'FSL: Moved BR_PHYS_ADDR