On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 08:23:53AM +0100, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
> Hi Vladimir,
>
> Le Wed, 25 Jan 2017 03:34:13 +0200, Vladimir Zapolskiy a
> écrit :
>
> > Hypothetically it could be possible that a machine maintainer finds that
> > after rebasing private changes on top of the
On 01/25/2017 01:13 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
> [re-sending without a URL in it]
>
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 12:28:47AM +0200, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
>> Hi Tom,
>>
>> On 01/24/2017 11:31 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
>>> We have a number of instances of platforms that define a MACH_TYPE_xxx
>>> value and
Hi Vladimir,
Le Wed, 25 Jan 2017 03:34:13 +0200, Vladimir Zapolskiy a
écrit :
> Hypothetically it could be possible that a machine maintainer finds that
> after rebasing private changes on top of the latest Linux release, a board
> mach type is not recognized by the Linux kernel
Hi Tom,
On 01/24/17 23:31, Tom Rini wrote:
> We have a number of instances of platforms that define a MACH_TYPE_xxx
> value and number. We are currently synced with the latest vales from
> the Linux Kernel and in turn if numbers are not used there it is because
> they were never officially used
Hi guys,
On 01/25/17 03:34, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
> On 01/25/2017 01:13 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
>> [re-sending without a URL in it]
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 12:28:47AM +0200, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
>>> Hi Tom,
>>>
>>> On 01/24/2017 11:31 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
We have a number of
[re-sending without a URL in it]
On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 12:28:47AM +0200, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> On 01/24/2017 11:31 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> > We have a number of instances of platforms that define a MACH_TYPE_xxx
> > value and number. We are currently synced with the latest
Hi Tom,
On 01/24/2017 11:31 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> We have a number of instances of platforms that define a MACH_TYPE_xxx
> value and number. We are currently synced with the latest vales from
> the Linux Kernel and in turn if numbers are not used there it is because
> they were never officially
We have a number of instances of platforms that define a MACH_TYPE_xxx
value and number. We are currently synced with the latest vales from
the Linux Kernel and in turn if numbers are not used there it is because
they were never officially used anywhere. We drop all our instances of
these
8 matches
Mail list logo