Hello Baruch,
Am 29.05.2018 um 06:45 schrieb Baruch Siach:
Equivalent code that disables the hidden i2c0 slave already exists in
the Turris Omnia platform specific code. But this hidden i2c0 slave that
interferes the i2c bus is not board specific. Armada 38x SoCs and at
least some Kirkwood varia
On 29.05.2018 19:55, Baruch Siach wrote:
Hi Stefan,
On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 08:11:55AM +0200, Stefan Roese wrote:
On 29.05.2018 06:45, Baruch Siach wrote:
Equivalent code that disables the hidden i2c0 slave already exists in
the Turris Omnia platform specific code. But this hidden i2c0 slave t
On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 4:46 PM Baruch Siach wrote:
> Equivalent code that disables the hidden i2c0 slave already exists in
> the Turris Omnia platform specific code. But this hidden i2c0 slave that
> interferes the i2c bus is not board specific. Armada 38x SoCs and at
> least some Kirkwood varia
On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 5:55 AM Baruch Siach wrote:
> Hi Stefan,
> On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 08:11:55AM +0200, Stefan Roese wrote:
> > On 29.05.2018 06:45, Baruch Siach wrote:
> > > Equivalent code that disables the hidden i2c0 slave already exists in
> > > the Turris Omnia platform specific code.
Hi Stefan,
On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 08:11:55AM +0200, Stefan Roese wrote:
> On 29.05.2018 06:45, Baruch Siach wrote:
> > Equivalent code that disables the hidden i2c0 slave already exists in
> > the Turris Omnia platform specific code. But this hidden i2c0 slave that
> > interferes the i2c bus is n
On 29.05.2018 06:45, Baruch Siach wrote:
Equivalent code that disables the hidden i2c0 slave already exists in
the Turris Omnia platform specific code. But this hidden i2c0 slave that
interferes the i2c bus is not board specific. Armada 38x SoCs and at
least some Kirkwood variants are affected as
Equivalent code that disables the hidden i2c0 slave already exists in
the Turris Omnia platform specific code. But this hidden i2c0 slave that
interferes the i2c bus is not board specific. Armada 38x SoCs and at
least some Kirkwood variants are affected as well. Add code to disable
this slave to th
Hello Chris,
Am 29.05.2018 um 05:49 schrieb Chris Packham:
On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 2:39 PM Baruch Siach wrote:
Hi Chris,
On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 10:32:47AM +1200, Chris Packham wrote:
Did you intend to omit the u-boot mailing list?
No, sorry. Thanks for noticing. I'll resend with the c
On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 3:56 PM Baruch Siach wrote:
> Hi Chris,
> On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 03:49:44PM +1200, Chris Packham wrote:
> > On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 2:39 PM Baruch Siach wrote:
> > > On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 10:32:47AM +1200, Chris Packham wrote:
> > > > Did you intend to omit the u-boot
Hi Chris,
On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 03:49:44PM +1200, Chris Packham wrote:
> On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 2:39 PM Baruch Siach wrote:
> > On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 10:32:47AM +1200, Chris Packham wrote:
> > > Did you intend to omit the u-boot mailing list?
>
> > No, sorry. Thanks for noticing. I'll resen
On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 2:39 PM Baruch Siach wrote:
> Hi Chris,
> On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 10:32:47AM +1200, Chris Packham wrote:
> > Did you intend to omit the u-boot mailing list?
> No, sorry. Thanks for noticing. I'll resend with the change that Stefan
> suggested and keep your Tested-by.
>
Hi Chris,
On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 10:32:47AM +1200, Chris Packham wrote:
> Did you intend to omit the u-boot mailing list?
No, sorry. Thanks for noticing. I'll resend with the change that Stefan
suggested and keep your Tested-by.
> On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 3:11 AM Baruch Siach wrote:
> > Equiva
12 matches
Mail list logo