On 31 July 2015 at 03:08, Bin Meng wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 3:40 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
>> Some devices are bound entirely by probing and do not have the benefit of
>> a device tree to give them a name. This is very common with PCI and USB. In
>> most cases this is fine, but we should add
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 3:40 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
> Some devices are bound entirely by probing and do not have the benefit of
> a device tree to give them a name. This is very common with PCI and USB. In
> most cases this is fine, but we should add an official way to set a device
> name. This sh
Some devices are bound entirely by probing and do not have the benefit of
a device tree to give them a name. This is very common with PCI and USB. In
most cases this is fine, but we should add an official way to set a device
name. This should be called in the device's bind() method.
Signed-off-by:
3 matches
Mail list logo
