Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/8] mtd: nand: sunxi: Fix strength minimum value

Hello Maxime, On Wed, 24 Jan 2018 08:46:18 +0100 Maxime Ripard wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 01:44:47AM +0100, Miquel Raynal wrote: > > When no requirement in Device Tree is given about the ECC strength and > > step size, the engine should fallback

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/8] mtd: nand: sunxi: Fix strength minimum value

Hello Boris, On Wed, 24 Jan 2018 08:57:23 +0100 Boris Brezillon wrote: > On Wed, 24 Jan 2018 01:44:47 +0100 > Miquel Raynal wrote: > > > When no requirement in Device Tree is given about the ECC strength and > > step size,

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/8] mtd: nand: sunxi: Fix strength minimum value

On Wed, 24 Jan 2018 01:44:47 +0100 Miquel Raynal wrote: > When no requirement in Device Tree is given about the ECC strength and > step size, the engine should fallback on the minimal working case for > this engine (16b/1024B) instead of the NAND chip

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/8] mtd: nand: sunxi: Fix strength minimum value

Hi, On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 01:44:47AM +0100, Miquel Raynal wrote: > When no requirement in Device Tree is given about the ECC strength and > step size, the engine should fallback on the minimal working case for > this engine (16b/1024B) instead of the NAND chip requirement which might > be

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/8] mtd: nand: sunxi: Fix strength minimum value

When no requirement in Device Tree is given about the ECC strength and step size, the engine should fallback on the minimal working case for this engine (16b/1024B) instead of the NAND chip requirement which might be simply unreachable. Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal