On Monday 27 August 2018 09:36 PM, Andreas Dannenberg wrote:
> Hi Kever,
>
> On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 11:26:52AM +0800, Kever Yang wrote:
>> Hi Philipp, Andreas,
>>
>>
>> On 08/25/2018 12:00 AM, Dr. Philipp Tomsich wrote:
On 24 Aug 2018, at 17:54, Andreas Dannenberg wrote:
Hi Kever,
On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 11:26:52AM +0800, Kever Yang wrote:
> Hi Philipp, Andreas,
>
>
> On 08/25/2018 12:00 AM, Dr. Philipp Tomsich wrote:
> >> On 24 Aug 2018, at 17:54, Andreas Dannenberg wrote:
> >>
> >> Philipp,
> >>
> >> On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 04:42:15PM +0200, Dr. Philipp
Hi Philipp,
On Friday 24 August 2018 08:12 PM, Dr. Philipp Tomsich wrote:
> +Kever
>
>> On 24 Aug 2018, at 16:12, Tom Rini wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 08:01:49PM +0530, Lokesh Vutla wrote:
>>
>>> From: Andreas Dannenberg
>>>
>>> The earlier commit f4fcba5c5ba ("clk: implement
Hi Philipp, Andreas,
On 08/25/2018 12:00 AM, Dr. Philipp Tomsich wrote:
>> On 24 Aug 2018, at 17:54, Andreas Dannenberg wrote:
>>
>> Philipp,
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 04:42:15PM +0200, Dr. Philipp Tomsich wrote:
>>> +Kever
>>>
On 24 Aug 2018, at 16:12, Tom Rini wrote:
On
Hi Philipp,
On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 06:00:31PM +0200, Dr. Philipp Tomsich wrote:
> >> If I remember correctly, David had a concern regarding an increase in
> >> boottime if we ran this twice… adding Kever, as he was also involved
> >> in the discussion.
> >>
> >> I settled on skipping it for
> On 24 Aug 2018, at 17:54, Andreas Dannenberg wrote:
>
> Philipp,
>
> On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 04:42:15PM +0200, Dr. Philipp Tomsich wrote:
>> +Kever
>>
>>> On 24 Aug 2018, at 16:12, Tom Rini wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 08:01:49PM +0530, Lokesh Vutla wrote:
>>>
From:
Philipp,
On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 04:42:15PM +0200, Dr. Philipp Tomsich wrote:
> +Kever
>
> > On 24 Aug 2018, at 16:12, Tom Rini wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 08:01:49PM +0530, Lokesh Vutla wrote:
> >
> >> From: Andreas Dannenberg
> >>
> >> The earlier commit f4fcba5c5ba ("clk:
+Kever
> On 24 Aug 2018, at 16:12, Tom Rini wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 08:01:49PM +0530, Lokesh Vutla wrote:
>
>> From: Andreas Dannenberg
>>
>> The earlier commit f4fcba5c5ba ("clk: implement clk_set_defaults()")
>> which introduced the functionality for setting clock defaults such
On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 08:01:49PM +0530, Lokesh Vutla wrote:
> From: Andreas Dannenberg
>
> The earlier commit f4fcba5c5ba ("clk: implement clk_set_defaults()")
> which introduced the functionality for setting clock defaults such as
> rates and parents will skip the processing when executing
From: Andreas Dannenberg
The earlier commit f4fcba5c5ba ("clk: implement clk_set_defaults()")
which introduced the functionality for setting clock defaults such as
rates and parents will skip the processing when executing in a re-reloc
state. This for example can prevent the assigning of clock
10 matches
Mail list logo