Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 18/18] Make the at91sam9263ek compile again.

2011-02-22 Thread Uli Raich
Dear Reinhard, Yes, the problems were mainly due to my ignorance with respect to git: I thought that rework110218 was just a later version of rework110202, which is clearly not the case. I probably also did not create a new branch, which had the effect that you see 17 patches, which were not

[U-Boot] [PATCH 18/18] Make the at91sam9263ek compile again.

2011-02-21 Thread Uli Raich
This version has been tested on an armputer-vmax board, which is similar to the at91sam9263ek but not on the at91sam9263ek board itself. A new configuration armputer-vmax_config has been added. This configuration has been tested on the hardware and is known to work. Further hardware tests for

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 18/18] Make the at91sam9263ek compile again.

2011-02-21 Thread Reinhard Meyer
Dear Uli Raich, This version has been tested on an armputer-vmax board, which is similar to the at91sam9263ek but not on the at91sam9263ek board itself. A new configuration armputer-vmax_config has been added. This configuration has been tested on the hardware and is known to work. Further

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 18/18] Make the at91sam9263ek compile again.

2011-02-21 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Uli Raich, In message 0f3ef05ca2a70e43b140ef090b9f97183efe0...@cernxchg22.cern.ch you wrote: This version has been tested on an armputer-vmax board, which is similar to the at91sam9263ek but not on the at91sam9263ek board itself. A new configuration armputer-vmax_config has been added.

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 18/18] Make the at91sam9263ek compile again.

2011-02-21 Thread Remy Bohmer
Hi, 2011/2/21 Uli Raich uli.ra...@cern.ch: This version has been tested on an armputer-vmax board, which is similar to the at91sam9263ek but not on the at91sam9263ek board itself. A new configuration armputer-vmax_config has been added. This configuration has been tested on the hardware and

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 18/18] Make the at91sam9263ek compile again.

2011-02-21 Thread Andreas Bießmann
Dear Remy Bohmer, Am 21.02.2011 12:00, schrieb Remy Bohmer: diff --git a/board/atmel/at91sam9263ek/led.c b/board/atmel/at91sam9263ek/led.c index fa1f05b..b3adc51 100644 --- a/board/atmel/at91sam9263ek/led.c +++ b/board/atmel/at91sam9263ek/led.c @@ -23,25 +23,22 @@ */ #include

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 18/18] Make the at91sam9263ek compile again.

2011-02-21 Thread Andreas Bießmann
Dear Remy Bohmer, Am 21.02.2011 14:09, schrieb Andreas Bießmann: Enable all the GPIO peripheral clocks in a board_early_init_f() routine. Not here. No, that is wrong! board_early_init_f() is too late! coloured_LED stuff is used (currently) in early init stage for debugging. Therefore we