On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 01:54:43PM +, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 07:16:56AM -0500, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 11:43:52AM +, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > > On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 12:15:09PM -0500, Tom Rini wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 02:03:58AM
On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 07:16:56AM -0500, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 11:43:52AM +, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 12:15:09PM -0500, Tom Rini wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 02:03:58AM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> > > > 2017-02-27 7:41 GMT+09:00 Tom Rini
On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 11:43:52AM +, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 12:15:09PM -0500, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 02:03:58AM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> > > 2017-02-27 7:41 GMT+09:00 Tom Rini :
> > > > On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 10:31:17AM
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 12:15:09PM -0500, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 02:03:58AM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> > 2017-02-27 7:41 GMT+09:00 Tom Rini :
> > > On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 10:31:17AM -0500, Tom Rini wrote:
> > > c) I'm not convinced your math above is
On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 02:03:58AM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> 2017-02-27 7:41 GMT+09:00 Tom Rini :
> > On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 10:31:17AM -0500, Tom Rini wrote:
> >> On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 06:17:38PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> >> > Hi Tom,
> >> >
> >> >
Hi Tom,
2017-02-27 7:41 GMT+09:00 Tom Rini :
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 10:31:17AM -0500, Tom Rini wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 06:17:38PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
>> > Hi Tom,
>> >
>> >
>> > 2017-02-23 1:19 GMT+09:00 Tom Rini :
>> > > On Wed, Feb
On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 10:31:17AM -0500, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 06:17:38PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> > Hi Tom,
> >
> >
> > 2017-02-23 1:19 GMT+09:00 Tom Rini :
> > > On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 11:34:26AM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> > >
> > >> At
On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 06:17:38PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
>
> 2017-02-23 1:19 GMT+09:00 Tom Rini :
> > On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 11:34:26AM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> >
> >> At first, the ARM64 Linux booting requirement recommended that the
> >> kernel
Hi Tom,
2017-02-23 1:19 GMT+09:00 Tom Rini :
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 11:34:26AM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
>
>> At first, the ARM64 Linux booting requirement recommended that the
>> kernel image be placed text_offset bytes from 2MB aligned base near
>> the start of
On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 11:34:26AM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> At first, the ARM64 Linux booting requirement recommended that the
> kernel image be placed text_offset bytes from 2MB aligned base near
> the start of usable system RAM because memory below that base address
> was unusable at
At first, the ARM64 Linux booting requirement recommended that the
kernel image be placed text_offset bytes from 2MB aligned base near
the start of usable system RAM because memory below that base address
was unusable at that time.
This requirement was relaxed by Linux commit a7f8de168ace
11 matches
Mail list logo