Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] efi_loader: Fall back to fdtfile naming convention

2016-04-14 Thread Alexander Graf
On 04/14/2016 01:24 AM, Stephen Warren wrote: On 04/13/2016 03:22 PM, Alexander Graf wrote: When there is no $fdtfile variable set, we still have a good chance that on 32bit arm the fdtfile really is just called $soc-$board.dtb. Enable the exports for $soc and $board in our distr defaults and m

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] efi_loader: Fall back to fdtfile naming convention

2016-04-14 Thread Alexander Graf
On 04/14/2016 03:43 PM, Andreas Färber wrote: Am 13.04.2016 um 23:22 schrieb Alexander Graf: When there is no $fdtfile variable set, we still have a good chance that on 32bit arm the fdtfile really is just called $soc-$board.dtb. Enable the exports for $soc and $board in our distr defaults and

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] efi_loader: Fall back to fdtfile naming convention

2016-04-14 Thread Andreas Färber
Am 13.04.2016 um 23:22 schrieb Alexander Graf: > When there is no $fdtfile variable set, we still have a good chance > that on 32bit arm the fdtfile really is just called $soc-$board.dtb. > > Enable the exports for $soc and $board in our distr defaults and make > use of them in the efi boot script

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] efi_loader: Fall back to fdtfile naming convention

2016-04-13 Thread Stephen Warren
On 04/13/2016 03:22 PM, Alexander Graf wrote: When there is no $fdtfile variable set, we still have a good chance that on 32bit arm the fdtfile really is just called $soc-$board.dtb. Enable the exports for $soc and $board in our distr defaults and make use of them in the efi boot script. diff

[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] efi_loader: Fall back to fdtfile naming convention

2016-04-13 Thread Alexander Graf
When there is no $fdtfile variable set, we still have a good chance that on 32bit arm the fdtfile really is just called $soc-$board.dtb. Enable the exports for $soc and $board in our distr defaults and make use of them in the efi boot script. Reported-by: Andreas Faerber Reported-by: Stephen War