On 07/18/2016 09:53 PM, Tien Fong Chee wrote:
On Fri, 2016-07-15 at 01:37 +0200, Benoît Thébaudeau wrote:
Dear Tien Fong,
On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 12:48 PM, Tien Fong Chee
wrote:
Dear Benoît,
On Wed, 2016-07-13 at 12:56 +0200, Benoît Thébaudeau wrote:
Dear Tien Fong Chee,
On Fri, 2016-07-15 at 01:37 +0200, Benoît Thébaudeau wrote:
> Dear Tien Fong,
>
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 12:48 PM, Tien Fong Chee
> wrote:
> > Dear Benoît,
> >
> > On Wed, 2016-07-13 at 12:56 +0200, Benoît Thébaudeau wrote:
> > > Dear Tien Fong Chee,
> > >
> > > On Jul 13,
Dear Tien Fong,
On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 12:48 PM, Tien Fong Chee wrote:
> Dear Benoît,
>
> On Wed, 2016-07-13 at 12:56 +0200, Benoît Thébaudeau wrote:
>> Dear Tien Fong Chee,
>>
>> On Jul 13, 2016 at 11:01 AM, Tien Fong Chee wrote:
>> > Single 64KB get_contents_vfatname_block
Dear Benoît,
On Wed, 2016-07-13 at 12:56 +0200, Benoît Thébaudeau wrote:
> Dear Tien Fong Chee,
>
> On Jul 13, 2016 at 11:01 AM, Tien Fong Chee wrote:
> > Single 64KB get_contents_vfatname_block global variable would be
> > used for
> > all FAT implementation instead of allocating additional two
Single 64KB get_contents_vfatname_block global variable would be used for
all FAT implementation instead of allocating additional two global variables
which are get_denfromdir_block and do_fat_read_at_block. This implementation
can help in saving up 128KB memory space.
Signed-off-by: Tien Fong
Dear Tien Fong Chee,
On Jul 13, 2016 at 11:01 AM, Tien Fong Chee wrote:
> Single 64KB get_contents_vfatname_block global variable would be used for
> all FAT implementation instead of allocating additional two global variables
> which are get_denfromdir_block and do_fat_read_at_block. This
6 matches
Mail list logo