Dear Scott Wood,
In message 20100830144648.10446...@schlenkerla.am.freescale.net you wrote:
POST is supposed to be an automatic, unmonitored functionality.
Results are suposed to be reported through a mechanism compatible to
Linux' syslog system.
There is no place for progress
On Thu, 02 Sep 2010 09:48:06 +0200, Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote:
And if we add such progress indicators, then we have
to make sure it integrates well with existing use.
One could define a global environment variable or command to enable or
disable progress indicators. Just like hash on
On Sun, 29 Aug 2010 10:56:47 +0200
Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote:
Dear York Sun,
In message 1282944356-4020-2-git-send-email-york...@freescale.com you wrote:
Add progress indicator for slow test. It is useful when the testing
takes too longer to finish. The indicator is reused from
Dear York Sun,
In message 1282944356-4020-2-git-send-email-york...@freescale.com you wrote:
Add progress indicator for slow test. It is useful when the testing
takes too longer to finish. The indicator is reused from flash
programming.
Hwconfig is used to turn on slow test when not enabled
-boot@lists.denx.de
Sent:8/29/2010 3:56 AM
Subject:Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/7] Expand POST memory test to support
arch-depended implementation.
Dear York Sun,
In message 1282944356-4020-2-git-send-email-york...@freescale.com you wrote:
Add progress indicator for slow test. It is useful when
5 matches
Mail list logo
