On Sep 22, 2009, at 3:05 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Kumar Gala,
In message 1253307595-28655-3-git-send-email-ga...@kernel.crashing.org
you wrote:
On CoreNet based platforms the LAW address is split between an high
low register and we no longer shift the address. Also, the target
Dear Kumar Gala,
In message 1253307595-28655-3-git-send-email-ga...@kernel.crashing.org you
wrote:
On CoreNet based platforms the LAW address is split between an high
low register and we no longer shift the address. Also, the target IDs
on CoreNet platforms have been completely re-assigned.
On CoreNet based platforms the LAW address is split between an high
low register and we no longer shift the address. Also, the target IDs
on CoreNet platforms have been completely re-assigned.
Additionally, added a new find_law() API to which LAW an address hits in.
This is need for the CoreNet
Kumar Gala wrote:
void set_law(u8 idx, phys_addr_t addr, enum law_size sz, enum law_trgt_if id)
{
+#ifdef CONFIG_FSL_CORENET
+ volatile ccsr_local_t *ccm;
+ volatile u32 *base, *lawbarh, *lawbarl, *lawar;
We don't really need the volatile...
void disable_law(u8 idx)
{
+#ifdef
Scott Wood wrote:
+base = (ccm-lawbarh0);
Use in_be32(). Likewise in find_law.
Grr, ignore me. I just had my brain baked by an ISO9000 presentation.
-Scott
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
Scott Wood wrote:
Scott Wood wrote:
+base = (ccm-lawbarh0);
Use in_be32(). Likewise in find_law.
Grr, ignore me. I just had my brain baked by an ISO9000 presentation.
You should always just go home after those things. Let someone else
drive, though :)
Ben
On Sep 18, 2009, at 4:55 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
+#ifdef CONFIG_FSL_CORENET
+volatile ccsr_local_t *ccm;
+volatile u32 *base, *lawbarh, *lawbarl, *lawar;
+
+ccm = (void *)(CONFIG_SYS_FSL_CORENET_CCM_ADDR);
+
+base = (ccm-lawbarh0);
+
7 matches
Mail list logo
