Signed-off-by: Daniel Mack dan...@caiaq.de
---
include/asm-arm/unaligned.h | 14 ++
1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 include/asm-arm/unaligned.h
diff --git a/include/asm-arm/unaligned.h b/include/asm-arm/unaligned.h
new file mode 100644
index
On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 12:27:21PM +0200, Daniel Mack wrote:
---
include/asm-arm/unaligned.h | 14 ++
1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 include/asm-arm/unaligned.h
This one was too easy, updated patch below.
With that one applied, the lzo1x
Dear Daniel Mack,
In message 20090604174208.gm26...@buzzloop.caiaq.de you wrote:
+static inline u16 get_unaligned_le16(const void *p)
+{
+ return __get_unaligned_cpu16((const u8 *)p);
+}
+
+static inline u32 get_unaligned_le32(const void *p)
+{
+ return
On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 09:03:47PM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
+static inline u16 get_unaligned_le16(const void *p)
+{
+ return __get_unaligned_cpu16((const u8 *)p);
+}
+
+static inline u32 get_unaligned_le32(const void *p)
+{
+ return __get_unaligned_cpu32((const u8 *)p);
+}
On Thursday 04 June 2009 21:23:31 Daniel Mack wrote:
Is there any guarantee that such macros are never used on device
registers and the like?
Well - how can I guarantee that? Anyway - the functions can be enhanced
later to make them work with different types of memories. For now, they
5 matches
Mail list logo