Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/3] bootcount: add DM-based backing store for bootcount

Hi Philipp, On 23 August 2018 at 07:48, Dr. Philipp Tomsich wrote: > Simon, > >> On 23 Aug 2018, at 12:45, Simon Glass wrote: >> >> Hi Philipp, >> >> On 17 August 2018 at 06:56, Dr. Philipp Tomsich >> wrote: >>> Simon, >>> >>> On 17 Aug 2018, at 14:49, Simon Glass wrote: >>> >>> Hi Philipp,

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/3] bootcount: add DM-based backing store for bootcount

Simon, > On 23 Aug 2018, at 12:45, Simon Glass wrote: > > Hi Philipp, > > On 17 August 2018 at 06:56, Dr. Philipp Tomsich > wrote: >> Simon, >> >> On 17 Aug 2018, at 14:49, Simon Glass wrote: >> >> Hi Philipp, >> >> On 14 August 2018 at 05:39, Dr. Philipp Tomsich >> wrote: >> >> Lukasz,

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/3] bootcount: add DM-based backing store for bootcount

Hi Philipp, On 17 August 2018 at 06:56, Dr. Philipp Tomsich wrote: > Simon, > > On 17 Aug 2018, at 14:49, Simon Glass wrote: > > Hi Philipp, > > On 14 August 2018 at 05:39, Dr. Philipp Tomsich > wrote: > > Lukasz, > > On 14 Aug 2018, at 13:10, Lukasz Majewski wrote: > > Hi Philipp, > > The

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/3] bootcount: add DM-based backing store for bootcount

Simon, > On 17 Aug 2018, at 14:49, Simon Glass wrote: > > Hi Philipp, > > On 14 August 2018 at 05:39, Dr. Philipp Tomsich > > wrote: >> Lukasz, >> >>> On 14 Aug 2018, at 13:10, Lukasz Majewski wrote: >>> >>> Hi Philipp, >>> The original

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/3] bootcount: add DM-based backing store for bootcount

Hi Philipp, On 14 August 2018 at 05:39, Dr. Philipp Tomsich wrote: > Lukasz, > >> On 14 Aug 2018, at 13:10, Lukasz Majewski wrote: >> >> Hi Philipp, >> >>> The original bootcount methods do not provide an interface to DM and >>> rely on a static configuration for I2C devices (e.g. bus,

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/3] bootcount: add DM-based backing store for bootcount

Lukasz, > On 14 Aug 2018, at 13:10, Lukasz Majewski wrote: > > Hi Philipp, > >> The original bootcount methods do not provide an interface to DM and >> rely on a static configuration for I2C devices (e.g. bus, chip-addr, >> etc. are configured through defines statically). On a modern system

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/3] bootcount: add DM-based backing store for bootcount

Hi Philipp, > The original bootcount methods do not provide an interface to DM and > rely on a static configuration for I2C devices (e.g. bus, chip-addr, > etc. are configured through defines statically). On a modern system > that exposes multiple devices in a DTS-configurable way, this is less

[U-Boot] [PATCH 3/3] bootcount: add DM-based backing store for bootcount

The original bootcount methods do not provide an interface to DM and rely on a static configuration for I2C devices (e.g. bus, chip-addr, etc. are configured through defines statically). On a modern system that exposes multiple devices in a DTS-configurable way, this is less than optimal and a