Dear =?utf-8?Q?Beno=C3=AEt_Th=C3=A9baudeau?=,
In message <1012612599.2335651.1344807326593.javamail.r...@advansee.com> you
wrote:
>
> > Please feel free to add this to your local code.
>
> By "local", do you mean that this new suggestion would still not be generic
> enough for you to be interest
On Sunday 12 August 2012 13:11:03 Benoît Thébaudeau wrote:
> OK. Actually, the only reason for which I need this patch is to make a
> variable read-only, and the only reason for which you reject it is because
> you fear that it breaks something.
and because it bloats the codebase for 0 gain for th
Dear Wolfgang Denk,
> > OK. Actually, the only reason for which I need this patch is to
> > make a variable
> > read-only, and the only reason for which you reject it is because
> > you fear that
> > it breaks something.
> >
> > So we could add a config like CONFIG_BOARD_REV_RO_VARIABLE to
> > ena
On 08/12/2012 11:06 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear =?utf-8?Q?Beno=C3=AEt_Th=C3=A9baudeau?=,
In message <1323086777.2324156.1344780597072.javamail.r...@advansee.com> you
wrote:
Anyway, when you will have implemented read-only and volatile flags for env
vars, this patch will no longer be needed.
Dear =?utf-8?Q?Beno=C3=AEt_Th=C3=A9baudeau?=,
In message <383502175.2331918.1344791463023.javamail.r...@advansee.com> you
wrote:
>
> OK. Actually, the only reason for which I need this patch is to make a
> variable
> read-only, and the only reason for which you reject it is because you fear
>
Dear =?utf-8?Q?Beno=C3=AEt_Th=C3=A9baudeau?=,
In message <1323086777.2324156.1344780597072.javamail.r...@advansee.com> you
wrote:
>
> Anyway, when you will have implemented read-only and volatile flags for env
> vars, this patch will no longer be needed. But with the current code, there is
> no
Dear =?utf-8?Q?Beno=C3=AEt_Th=C3=A9baudeau?=,
In message <1642597694.2324115.1344780168514.javamail.r...@advansee.com> you
wrote:
>
> > You cannot expect to see the real, production environments in the
> > mainline source tree.
>
> Right, but the same applied to serial# and ethaddr when they wer
Dear Mike Frysinger,
> > > > I have searched such a usage in the tree, but did not find any,
> > > > so
> > > > this should
> > > > not break anything.
> > >
> > > You cannot expect to see the real, production environments in the
> > > mainline source tree.
> >
> > Right, but the same applied to
On Sunday 12 August 2012 10:02:48 Benoît Thébaudeau wrote:
> Dear Wolfgang Denk,
> > > I have searched such a usage in the tree, but did not find any, so
> > > this should
> > > not break anything.
> >
> > You cannot expect to see the real, production environments in the
> > mainline source tree.
Dear Wolfgang Denk,
> > > I have searched such a usage in the tree, but did not find any,
> > > so
> > > this should
> > > not break anything.
> >
> > You cannot expect to see the real, production environments in the
> > mainline source tree.
>
> Right, but the same applied to serial# and ethadd
Dear Wolfgang Denk,
> > I have searched such a usage in the tree, but did not find any, so
> > this should
> > not break anything.
>
> You cannot expect to see the real, production environments in the
> mainline source tree.
Right, but the same applied to serial# and ethaddr when they were added
Dear =?utf-8?Q?Beno=C3=AEt_Th=C3=A9baudeau?=,
In message <1666183421.2304101.1344712292461.javamail.r...@advansee.com> you
wrote:
>
> I have searched such a usage in the tree, but did not find any, so this should
> not break anything.
You cannot expect to see the real, production environments i
Dear =?utf-8?Q?Beno=C3=AEt_Th=C3=A9baudeau?=,
In message <2028294275.2280404.1344620768178.javamail.r...@advansee.com> you
wrote:
> The board revision can be a useful env var, like its serial number.
It can be useful, but it appears not many boards needed it so far,
so I suggest we leave as is;
Hi Mike,
On Saturday 11 August 2012 19:48:33 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Friday 10 August 2012 13:46:08 Benoît Thébaudeau wrote:
> > The board revision can be a useful env var, like its serial number.
>
> unless i missed something, there is no standard "rev" variable today,
> which
> means this ch
On Friday 10 August 2012 13:46:08 Benoît Thébaudeau wrote:
> The board revision can be a useful env var, like its serial number.
unless i missed something, there is no standard "rev" variable today, which
means this change can easily break anyone who happens to already be using a
variable named
The board revision can be a useful env var, like its serial number.
Signed-off-by: Benoît Thébaudeau
Cc: Wolfgang Denk
---
{u-boot-4d3c95f.orig => u-boot-4d3c95f}/README | 21 ++--
.../common/cmd_nvedit.c|5 +++--
.../tools/env/fw_env.c
16 matches
Mail list logo
