Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 5/5] remoteproc: stm32: invert the is_running() return value

On 11/10/2019 10:00 PM, Suman Anna wrote: > On 10/9/19 10:36 AM, Fabien Dessenne wrote: >> The .is_running() ops expects a return value of 0 if the processor is >> running, 1 if not running : align to this. >> >> Signed-off-by: Fabien Dessenne > This patch should be earlier than patch4, right?

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 5/5] remoteproc: stm32: invert the is_running() return value

On 10/9/19 10:36 AM, Fabien Dessenne wrote: > The .is_running() ops expects a return value of 0 if the processor is > running, 1 if not running : align to this. > > Signed-off-by: Fabien Dessenne This patch should be earlier than patch4, right? Reviewed-by: Suman Anna > --- >

[U-Boot] [PATCH 5/5] remoteproc: stm32: invert the is_running() return value

The .is_running() ops expects a return value of 0 if the processor is running, 1 if not running : align to this. Signed-off-by: Fabien Dessenne --- drivers/remoteproc/stm32_copro.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_copro.c