On Mon, Jun 01, 2009 at 12:11:52AM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
+#define CONFIG_BOARDINFOPhytec Phycore mpc5200b tiny
Too long. Please be terse.
The official name of the board is phyCORE-MPC5200B-tiny.
rsc
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Dear Jon Smirl,
In message 9e4733910905311659u5e7c77a2ld80b526149c0d...@mail.gmail.com you
wrote:
Are you sure? This is pessimal choice. EEPROM is slow and unreliable.
After you decided for a solution, then please remove the (then) dead
code.
Phytec ships default with the boards
Dear Jon Smirl,
In message 9e4733910905311805r2682b953tb87a4b97847b8...@mail.gmail.com you
wrote:
On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 6:11 PM, Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote:
+#define CONFIG_SYS_LOAD_ADDR 0x10 /* default load address */
This used to be a reasonable choice with Linux 2.4.4; it
Dear Jon Smirl,
In message 20090530194126.12535.19728.st...@terra you wrote:
Add support for the Phytec phyCORE-MPC5200B-tiny. Code originally from
Pengutronix.de.
Added MAKEALL and MAINTAINER entry per last posting.
...
+#ifndef CONFIG_SYS_RAMBOOT
+static void sdram_start(int hi_addr)
+{
On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 6:11 PM, Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote:
+/*---
+ Environment settings
+---*/
+#if 0
+#define CONFIG_ENV_IS_IN_FLASH
On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 6:11 PM, Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote:
+#define CONFIG_SYS_LOAD_ADDR 0x10 /* default load address */
This used to be a reasonable choice with Linux 2.4.4; it ain't so any
more.
What should it be?
--
Jon Smirl
jonsm...@gmail.com
Add support for the Phytec phyCORE-MPC5200B-tiny. Code originally from
Pengutronix.de.
Added MAKEALL and MAINTAINER entry per last posting.
Signed-off-by: Jon Smirl jonsm...@gmail.com
---
MAINTAINERS |4
MAKEALL |1
Makefile
7 matches
Mail list logo
