Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V4 2/2] bootm: Handle kernel_noload on arm64

2018-06-13 Thread Tom Rini
On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 12:39:25PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: > On 06/13/2018 09:51 AM, Bin Chen wrote: > > > > > > On 13 June 2018 at 14:13, Marek Vasut > > wrote: > > > > The ARM64 has 2 MiB alignment requirement for the kernel. When using > > fitImage,

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V4 2/2] bootm: Handle kernel_noload on arm64

2018-06-13 Thread Marek Vasut
On 06/13/2018 09:51 AM, Bin Chen wrote: > > > On 13 June 2018 at 14:13, Marek Vasut > wrote: > > The ARM64 has 2 MiB alignment requirement for the kernel. When using > fitImage, this requirement may by violated, the kernel will thus be > executed from

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V4 2/2] bootm: Handle kernel_noload on arm64

2018-06-13 Thread Bin Chen
On 13 June 2018 at 14:13, Marek Vasut wrote: > The ARM64 has 2 MiB alignment requirement for the kernel. When using > fitImage, this requirement may by violated, the kernel will thus be > executed from unaligned address and fail to boot. Do what booti does > and run booti_setup() for

[U-Boot] [PATCH V4 2/2] bootm: Handle kernel_noload on arm64

2018-06-12 Thread Marek Vasut
The ARM64 has 2 MiB alignment requirement for the kernel. When using fitImage, this requirement may by violated, the kernel will thus be executed from unaligned address and fail to boot. Do what booti does and run booti_setup() for kernel_noload images on arm64 to obtain a suitable aligned address