On Mon, Aug 07, 2017 at 12:16:54PM -0400, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 11:47 AM, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 06, 2017 at 11:34:15AM -0400, Rob Clark wrote:
> >> On Sun, Aug 6, 2017 at 10:45 AM, Rob Clark wrote:
> >> >
> >> > I've started trying to hack up test_efi_loader.py
On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 10:41:32PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
[...]
> ..and what you're sketching out here should work with recent enough
> versions of our bootloader.
>
> However, to me having an ACPI Device Path component in there doesn't
> make much sense on a board without ACPI. It certainly
On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 11:47 AM, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 06, 2017 at 11:34:15AM -0400, Rob Clark wrote:
>> On Sun, Aug 6, 2017 at 10:45 AM, Rob Clark wrote:
>> >
>> > I've started trying to hack up test_efi_loader.py to add a test that
>> > loads OpenBSD's bootloader.. kinda muddling
On Sun, Aug 06, 2017 at 11:34:15AM -0400, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 6, 2017 at 10:45 AM, Rob Clark wrote:
> >
> > I've started trying to hack up test_efi_loader.py to add a test that
> > loads OpenBSD's bootloader.. kinda muddling through it at this point,
> > since not a py expert or too fa
On Sun, Aug 6, 2017 at 2:47 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 6, 2017 at 2:37 PM, Mark Kettenis wrote:
>>> Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2017 20:21:45 +0200 (CEST)
>>> From: Mark Kettenis
>>>
>>> > Mind sending me or pastebin'ing your u-boot .config? There are some
>>> > different device-path construction
On Sun, Aug 6, 2017 at 2:37 PM, Mark Kettenis wrote:
>> Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2017 20:21:45 +0200 (CEST)
>> From: Mark Kettenis
>>
>> > Mind sending me or pastebin'ing your u-boot .config? There are some
>> > different device-path construction depending on legacy vs
>> > CONFIG_DM+CONFIG_BLK (the leg
On Sun, Aug 6, 2017 at 2:21 PM, Mark Kettenis wrote:
>> From: Rob Clark
>> Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2017 13:49:43 -0400
>>
>> On Sun, Aug 6, 2017 at 1:28 PM, Mark Kettenis
>> wrote:
>> >> From: Rob Clark
>> >> Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2017 11:34:15 -0400
>> >>
>> >> On Sun, Aug 6, 2017 at 10:45 AM, Rob Clark
> Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2017 20:21:45 +0200 (CEST)
> From: Mark Kettenis
>
> > Mind sending me or pastebin'ing your u-boot .config? There are some
> > different device-path construction depending on legacy vs
> > CONFIG_DM+CONFIG_BLK (the legacy case *looks* right to me, and is used
> > by vexpress_c
> From: Rob Clark
> Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2017 13:49:43 -0400
>
> On Sun, Aug 6, 2017 at 1:28 PM, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> >> From: Rob Clark
> >> Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2017 11:34:15 -0400
> >>
> >> On Sun, Aug 6, 2017 at 10:45 AM, Rob Clark wrote:
> >> >
> >> > I've started trying to hack up test_efi_loa
On Sun, Aug 6, 2017 at 6:49 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 6, 2017 at 1:28 PM, Mark Kettenis wrote:
>>> From: Rob Clark
>>> Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2017 11:34:15 -0400
>>>
>>> On Sun, Aug 6, 2017 at 10:45 AM, Rob Clark wrote:
>>> >
>>> > I've started trying to hack up test_efi_loader.py to add a t
On Sun, Aug 6, 2017 at 1:28 PM, Mark Kettenis wrote:
>> From: Rob Clark
>> Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2017 11:34:15 -0400
>>
>> On Sun, Aug 6, 2017 at 10:45 AM, Rob Clark wrote:
>> >
>> > I've started trying to hack up test_efi_loader.py to add a test that
>> > loads OpenBSD's bootloader.. kinda muddling
> From: Rob Clark
> Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2017 11:34:15 -0400
>
> On Sun, Aug 6, 2017 at 10:45 AM, Rob Clark wrote:
> >
> > I've started trying to hack up test_efi_loader.py to add a test that
> > loads OpenBSD's bootloader.. kinda muddling through it at this point,
> > since not a py expert or too
On Sun, Aug 06, 2017 at 11:34:15AM -0400, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 6, 2017 at 10:45 AM, Rob Clark wrote:
> >
> > I've started trying to hack up test_efi_loader.py to add a test that
> > loads OpenBSD's bootloader.. kinda muddling through it at this point,
> > since not a py expert or too fa
On 08/06/2017 05:34 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 6, 2017 at 10:45 AM, Rob Clark wrote:
>>
>> I've started trying to hack up test_efi_loader.py to add a test that
>> loads OpenBSD's bootloader.. kinda muddling through it at this point,
>> since not a py expert or too familiar w/ u-boot's tes
On Sun, Aug 6, 2017 at 10:45 AM, Rob Clark wrote:
>
> I've started trying to hack up test_efi_loader.py to add a test that
> loads OpenBSD's bootloader.. kinda muddling through it at this point,
> since not a py expert or too familiar w/ u-boot's test framework. But
> I'll see if I can get to th
On Sun, Aug 6, 2017 at 10:28 AM, Mark Kettenis wrote:
>> Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2017 15:16:09 +0200 (CEST)
>> From: Mark Kettenis
>>
>> Things are already broken before that commit though, so there is
>> another problem. I'll see if I can figure out what it is...
>
> data abort
> pc : [<7ef59160>]
> Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2017 15:16:09 +0200 (CEST)
> From: Mark Kettenis
>
> Things are already broken before that commit though, so there is
> another problem. I'll see if I can figure out what it is...
data abort
pc : [<7ef59160>] lr : [<7ef59118>]
reloc pc : [<4a003160>]lr : [<4a0031
On Sun, Aug 6, 2017 at 10:17 AM, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 6, 2017 at 9:16 AM, Mark Kettenis wrote:
>>> From: Rob Clark
>>> Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2017 11:36:25 -0400
>>>
>>> On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 11:24 AM, Rob Clark wrote:
>>> > On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 11:10 AM, Heinrich Schuchardt
>>> > wrot
On Sun, Aug 6, 2017 at 9:16 AM, Mark Kettenis wrote:
>> From: Rob Clark
>> Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2017 11:36:25 -0400
>>
>> On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 11:24 AM, Rob Clark wrote:
>> > On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 11:10 AM, Heinrich Schuchardt
>> > wrote:
>> >> On 08/05/2017 04:35 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
>> >>> On
> From: Rob Clark
> Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2017 11:36:25 -0400
>
> On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 11:24 AM, Rob Clark wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 11:10 AM, Heinrich Schuchardt
> > wrote:
> >> On 08/05/2017 04:35 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
> >>> On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 10:28 AM, Mark Kettenis
> >>> wrote:
>
> From: Rob Clark
> Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2017 10:28:34 -0400
>
> On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 10:01 AM, Mark Kettenis
> wrote:
> >
> > OpenBSD doesn't run on the db410c. However, our EFI bootloader should
> > just run. You can download it from:
> >
> > http://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/arm
On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 12:02 PM, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> On 08/05/2017 05:22 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
>> On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 11:08 AM, Mark Kettenis
>> wrote:
From: Rob Clark
Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2017 10:35:08 -0400
On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 10:28 AM, Mark Kettenis
wrote
On 08/05/2017 05:22 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 11:08 AM, Mark Kettenis
> wrote:
>>> From: Rob Clark
>>> Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2017 10:35:08 -0400
>>>
>>> On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 10:28 AM, Mark Kettenis
>>> wrote:
> Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2017 16:01:51 +0200 (CEST)
> From: Mark K
On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 11:24 AM, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 11:10 AM, Heinrich Schuchardt
> wrote:
>> On 08/05/2017 04:35 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
>>> On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 10:28 AM, Mark Kettenis
>>> wrote:
> Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2017 16:01:51 +0200 (CEST)
> From: Mark Ketteni
On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 11:10 AM, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> On 08/05/2017 04:35 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
>> On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 10:28 AM, Mark Kettenis
>> wrote:
Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2017 16:01:51 +0200 (CEST)
From: Mark Kettenis
Unfortunately something in this patch series bre
On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 11:08 AM, Mark Kettenis wrote:
>> From: Rob Clark
>> Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2017 10:35:08 -0400
>>
>> On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 10:28 AM, Mark Kettenis
>> wrote:
>> >> Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2017 16:01:51 +0200 (CEST)
>> >> From: Mark Kettenis
>> >>
>> >> Unfortunately something in thi
On 08/05/2017 04:35 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 10:28 AM, Mark Kettenis
> wrote:
>>> Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2017 16:01:51 +0200 (CEST)
>>> From: Mark Kettenis
>>>
>>> Unfortunately something in this patch series breaks things for me on a
>>> Banana Pi:
>>
>> And according to git bise
> From: Rob Clark
> Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2017 10:35:08 -0400
>
> On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 10:28 AM, Mark Kettenis
> wrote:
> >> Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2017 16:01:51 +0200 (CEST)
> >> From: Mark Kettenis
> >>
> >> Unfortunately something in this patch series breaks things for me on a
> >> Banana Pi:
> >
>
On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 10:28 AM, Mark Kettenis wrote:
>> Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2017 16:01:51 +0200 (CEST)
>> From: Mark Kettenis
>>
>> Unfortunately something in this patch series breaks things for me on a
>> Banana Pi:
>
> And according to git bisect:
>
> 4e3e748a50fc3f43e20c7ff407184596d7c9a589 is t
> Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2017 16:01:51 +0200 (CEST)
> From: Mark Kettenis
>
> Unfortunately something in this patch series breaks things for me on a
> Banana Pi:
And according to git bisect:
4e3e748a50fc3f43e20c7ff407184596d7c9a589 is the first bad commit
commit 4e3e748a50fc3f43e20c7ff407184596d7c9a5
On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 10:01 AM, Mark Kettenis wrote:
>
> OpenBSD doesn't run on the db410c. However, our EFI bootloader should
> just run. You can download it from:
>
> http://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/arm64/BOOTAA64.EFI
>
> for the 64-bit (AArch64) and
>
> http://ftp.openbsd.or
On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 10:01 AM, Mark Kettenis wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 4:41 PM, Mark Kettenis
>> wrote:
>> >> From: Rob Clark
>> >> Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2017 15:31:55 -0400
>> >
>> > Hi Rob,
>> >
>> > OpenBSD has been an early adopter of efi_loader and pretty much
>> > completely relie
> Authentication-Results: xs4all.nl; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com;
> dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com; dmarc=pass header.from=gmail.com
> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
> d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
> h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-
On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 4:41 PM, Mark Kettenis wrote:
>> From: Rob Clark
>> Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2017 15:31:55 -0400
>
> Hi Rob,
>
> OpenBSD has been an early adopter of efi_loader and pretty much
> completely relies on it for booting OpenBSD/armv7 and OpenBSD/arm64.
> We use our own bootloader which
> From: Rob Clark
> Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2017 15:31:55 -0400
Hi Rob,
OpenBSD has been an early adopter of efi_loader and pretty much
completely relies on it for booting OpenBSD/armv7 and OpenBSD/arm64.
We use our own bootloader which is fairly lightweight. Obviously we'd
like to keep it working if
Also, create disk objects for the disk itself, in addition to the
partitions. (UEFI terminology is a bit confusing, a "disk" object is
really a partition.) This helps grub properly identify the boot device
since it is trying to match up partition "disk" object with it's parent
device.
Now instea
36 matches
Mail list logo