On 09/28/2012 01:18 AM, Kim Phillips wrote:
On Thu, 27 Sep 2012 09:21:19 +0200
Gerlando Falautogerlando.fala...@keymile.com wrote:
On 09/27/2012 03:22 AM, Kim Phillips wrote:
[...]
so far the 8308 and the 8360 are the only SoCs that don't have a
'tens'/MPC83Xx defines. The 8360 can get
On Fri, 28 Sep 2012 16:08:39 +0200
Gerlando Falauto gerlando.fala...@keymile.com wrote:
On 09/28/2012 01:18 AM, Kim Phillips wrote:
On Thu, 27 Sep 2012 09:21:19 +0200
Gerlando Falautogerlando.fala...@keymile.com wrote:
On 09/27/2012 03:22 AM, Kim Phillips wrote:
[...]
so far the 8308
On 09/27/2012 03:22 AM, Kim Phillips wrote:
On Wed, 26 Sep 2012 10:28:08 +0200
Gerlando Falautogerlando.fala...@keymile.com wrote:
This processor, though very similar to other members of the
PowerQUICC II Pro family (namely 8308, 8360 and 832x), provides
yet another feature set than any
On Thu, 27 Sep 2012 09:21:19 +0200
Gerlando Falauto gerlando.fala...@keymile.com wrote:
On 09/27/2012 03:22 AM, Kim Phillips wrote:
On Wed, 26 Sep 2012 10:28:08 +0200
Gerlando Falautogerlando.fala...@keymile.com wrote:
- CONFIG_MPC83XX_FEAT_QE
this could be CONFIG_QE but should
This processor, though very similar to other members of the
PowerQUICC II Pro family (namely 8308, 8360 and 832x), provides
yet another feature set than any supported sibling.
So we add a bunch of new #ifdefs (or complicate the existing ones)
to arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc83xx/speed.c.
Perhaps it would
On Wed, 26 Sep 2012 10:28:08 +0200
Gerlando Falauto gerlando.fala...@keymile.com wrote:
This processor, though very similar to other members of the
PowerQUICC II Pro family (namely 8308, 8360 and 832x), provides
yet another feature set than any supported sibling.
So we add a bunch of new
6 matches
Mail list logo