On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 9:45 PM, Bin Meng wrote:
> Hi Andy,
>
> On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 3:32 AM, Andy Shevchenko
> wrote:
>> If ACPI HW reduced bit in FADT is set we should ignore any ACPI hardware
>> communications.
>>
>> Signed-off-by:
On Sun, 2017-07-23 at 08:48 +0800, Bin Meng wrote:
> Hi Andy,
>
> On Sun, Jul 23, 2017 at 12:43 AM, Andy Shevchenko
> wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 4:45 PM, Bin Meng
> > wrote:
> > > I assume this is needed on Intel Edison.
> >
> > Actually
Hi Andy,
On Sun, Jul 23, 2017 at 12:43 AM, Andy Shevchenko
wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 4:45 PM, Bin Meng wrote:
>> Hi Andy,
>>
>> On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 3:32 AM, Andy Shevchenko
>> wrote:
>>> If ACPI HW
Hi Andy,
On Sun, Jul 23, 2017 at 12:43 AM, Andy Shevchenko
wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 4:45 PM, Bin Meng wrote:
>> Hi Andy,
>>
>> On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 3:32 AM, Andy Shevchenko
>> wrote:
>>> If ACPI HW
On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 4:45 PM, Bin Meng wrote:
> Hi Andy,
>
> On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 3:32 AM, Andy Shevchenko
> wrote:
>> If ACPI HW reduced bit in FADT is set we should ignore any ACPI hardware
>> communications.
>>
>> Signed-off-by:
Hi Andy,
On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 3:32 AM, Andy Shevchenko
wrote:
> If ACPI HW reduced bit in FADT is set we should ignore any ACPI hardware
> communications.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko
> ---
>
If ACPI HW reduced bit in FADT is set we should ignore any ACPI hardware
communications.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko
---
arch/x86/lib/acpi_table.c | 4
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/x86/lib/acpi_table.c b/arch/x86/lib/acpi_table.c
7 matches
Mail list logo