Dear Jagan,
> -Original Message-
> From: U-Boot [mailto:u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de] On Behalf Of Jagan
> Teki
> Sent: Thursday, December 28, 2017 11:42 AM
> To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
> Cc: Tom Rini
> Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v10 00/27] dm: Generic MTD Subsy
Hi :
2018-01-03 18:59 GMT+08:00 Lukasz Majewski :
> Hi Jagan,
>
> > On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 2:18 PM, Vignesh R wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tuesday 02 January 2018 03:39 PM, Jagan Teki wrote:
> > >> On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 8:14 PM, Lukasz Majewski
> > >> wrote:
> > >>> Hi Jagan,
> > >>>
> >
ehalf Of Jagan
> >> Teki
> >> Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2018 3:39 PM
> >> To: Lukasz Majewski
> >> Cc: U-Boot Mailing List ; Tom Rini
> >>
> >> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v10 00/27] dm: Generic MTD Subsystem,
> >> with SPI-NOR in
ewski
>> Cc: U-Boot Mailing List ; Tom Rini
>>
>> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v10 00/27] dm: Generic MTD Subsystem, with
>> SPI-NOR interface
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 8:14 PM, Lukasz Majewski
>> wrote:
>> > Hi Jagan,
>> >
&
Hi Jagan,
> -Original Message-
> From: U-Boot [mailto:u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de] On Behalf Of Jagan
> Teki
> Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2018 3:39 PM
> To: Lukasz Majewski
> Cc: U-Boot Mailing List ; Tom Rini
>
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v10 00/27] dm: Gen
Hi Jagan,
> -Original Message-
> From: U-Boot [mailto:u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de] On Behalf Of Jagan
> Teki
> Sent: Thursday, December 28, 2017 11:42 AM
> To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
> Cc: Tom Rini
> Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v10 00/27] dm: Generic MTD Subsystem, wit
On Wednesday 03 January 2018 02:54 PM, Jagan Teki wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 2:18 PM, Vignesh R wrote:
>>
[...]
>
> ===
> cmd/spinor.c
^ - this would be a new set of commands to comply
Hi Jagan,
> On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 2:18 PM, Vignesh R wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Tuesday 02 January 2018 03:39 PM, Jagan Teki wrote:
> >> On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 8:14 PM, Lukasz Majewski
> >> wrote:
> >>> Hi Jagan,
> >>>
> Compared to previous series’s [1], [2], [3] and [4] this patch
> >>
On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 2:18 PM, Vignesh R wrote:
>
>
> On Tuesday 02 January 2018 03:39 PM, Jagan Teki wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 8:14 PM, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
>>> Hi Jagan,
>>>
Compared to previous series’s [1], [2], [3] and [4] this patch set
redefined most of the implementat
On Tuesday 02 January 2018 03:39 PM, Jagan Teki wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 8:14 PM, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
>> Hi Jagan,
>>
>>> Compared to previous series’s [1], [2], [3] and [4] this patch set
>>> redefined most of the implementation suitable to fit into existing
>>> driver-model.
>>>
>>>
On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 8:14 PM, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
> Hi Jagan,
>
>> Compared to previous series’s [1], [2], [3] and [4] this patch set
>> redefined most of the implementation suitable to fit into existing
>> driver-model.
>>
>> MTD is generic subsystem for underlying flash devices like nand,
Hi Jagan,
> Compared to previous series’s [1], [2], [3] and [4] this patch set
> redefined most of the implementation suitable to fit into existing
> driver-model.
>
> MTD is generic subsystem for underlying flash devices like nand,
> parallel nor, spinor, dataflash etc. So to drive this theory w
Compared to previous series’s [1], [2], [3] and [4] this patch set
redefined most of the implementation suitable to fit into existing driver-model.
MTD is generic subsystem for underlying flash devices like nand,
parallel nor, spinor, dataflash etc. So to drive this theory with
driver model(with a
13 matches
Mail list logo
