Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] lsxl: add support for lschlv2 and lsxhl

2012-04-02 Thread Prafulla Wadaskar
-Original Message- From: Michael Walle [mailto:mich...@walle.cc] Sent: 30 March 2012 19:27 To: Prafulla Wadaskar Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de; Wolfgang Denk Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] lsxl: add support for lschlv2 and lsxhl Hi Prafulla, [ I'm CCing Wolfgang on this, because i

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] lsxl: add support for lschlv2 and lsxhl

2012-03-30 Thread Prafulla Wadaskar
-Original Message- From: Michael Walle [mailto:mich...@walle.cc] Sent: 29 March 2012 20:09 To: Prafulla Wadaskar Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] lsxl: add support for lschlv2 and lsxhl Am Donnerstag 29 März 2012, 16:24:23 schrieb Prafulla Wadaskar:

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] lsxl: add support for lschlv2 and lsxhl

2012-03-30 Thread Michael Walle
Hi Prafulla, [ I'm CCing Wolfgang on this, because i don't know who's responsible for the build/make infrastructure. ] AFAIK, you need to pass only u-boot.kwb to the make (no $(okj) needed) Sorry you're wrong here, that won't work for out-of-tree builds, see below. [mw@thanatos b-u-boot]$

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] lsxl: add support for lschlv2 and lsxhl

2012-03-29 Thread Michael Walle
Hi Wolfgang, I still fail to understand why you would need fixed network settings. Evenin emergency cases, the only parameter you really need is a MAC address, all others can be fetched for example from a DHCP server. bootp/dhcp should work for getting the ip address. My initial thought was

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] lsxl: add support for lschlv2 and lsxhl

2012-03-29 Thread Michael Walle
Am Dienstag 27 März 2012, 09:27:49 schrieb Prafulla Wadaskar: # diff --git a/board/buffalo/lsxl/config.mk b/board/buffalo/lsxl/config.mk new file mode 100644 index 000..062554b --- /dev/null +++ b/board/buffalo/lsxl/config.mk @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +ALL-y += $(obj)u-boot.kwb Pls remove

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] lsxl: add support for lschlv2 and lsxhl

2012-03-29 Thread Prafulla Wadaskar
-Original Message- From: Michael Walle [mailto:mich...@walle.cc] Sent: 29 March 2012 18:08 To: Prafulla Wadaskar Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] lsxl: add support for lschlv2 and lsxhl Am Dienstag 27 März 2012, 09:27:49 schrieb Prafulla Wadaskar: # diff --git

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] lsxl: add support for lschlv2 and lsxhl

2012-03-29 Thread Michael Walle
Am Donnerstag 29 März 2012, 16:24:23 schrieb Prafulla Wadaskar: -Original Message- From: Michael Walle [mailto:mich...@walle.cc] Sent: 29 March 2012 18:08 To: Prafulla Wadaskar Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] lsxl: add support for lschlv2 and lsxhl Am

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] lsxl: add support for lschlv2 and lsxhl

2012-03-27 Thread Prafulla Wadaskar
Please use Kirkwood: add xxx board support as a patch heading to identify the patch for kirkwood This patchset adds support for both the Linkstation Live (LS-CHLv2) and Linkstation Pro (LS-XHL) by Buffalo. Signed-off-by: Michael Walle michael at walle.cc Cc: Prafulla Wadaskar prafulla at

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] lsxl: add support for lschlv2 and lsxhl

2012-03-27 Thread Prafulla Wadaskar
-Original Message- From: Michael Walle [mailto:mich...@walle.cc] Sent: 26 March 2012 15:46 To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Cc: Prafulla Wadaskar; Wolfgang Denk Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] lsxl: add support for lschlv2 and lsxhl On Fri, March 2, 2012 17:02, Michael Walle wrote: This

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] lsxl: add support for lschlv2 and lsxhl

2012-03-27 Thread Michael Walle
Hi Prafulla, thanks for the review. +++ b/board/buffalo/lsxl/kwbimage-lsxhl.cfg BTW: What is difference between them? if it is very small you can manage it through c file. mh? arent these the values which end up in the head of an SPI image, the SoC bootstrap rom will execute? how can these

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] lsxl: add support for lschlv2 and lsxhl

2012-03-27 Thread Prafulla Wadaskar
-Original Message- From: Michael Walle [mailto:mich...@walle.cc] Sent: 27 March 2012 16:22 To: Prafulla Wadaskar Cc: Michael Walle; u-boot@lists.denx.de Subject: RE: [PATCH v2] lsxl: add support for lschlv2 and lsxhl Hi Prafulla, thanks for the review. +++

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] lsxl: add support for lschlv2 and lsxhl

2012-03-27 Thread Michael Walle
Am Dienstag 27 März 2012, 09:27:49 schrieb Prafulla Wadaskar: Is the chip 6281/6282 or 6192? It' a 88F6281-A1. -- Michael ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] lsxl: add support for lschlv2 and lsxhl

2012-03-27 Thread Michael Walle
Hi, Am Dienstag 27 März 2012, 13:05:05 schrieb Prafulla Wadaskar: I removed the hardcoded values from the environment and put it into a special rescue mode, so it won't show up until the user is explicitly choosing that mode. I can understand, that hardcoded values are bad but in this

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] lsxl: add support for lschlv2 and lsxhl

2012-03-27 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Michael, In message 201203272255.59259.mich...@walle.cc you wrote: Wolfgang, what do you think about relaxing this policy a bit and allowing this class of devices (no service port/serial port available, no storage for the MAC address besides the environment) to use hardcoded values

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] lsxl: add support for lschlv2 and lsxhl

2012-03-26 Thread Michael Walle
On Fri, March 2, 2012 17:02, Michael Walle wrote: This patchset adds support for both the Linkstation Live (LS-CHLv2) and Linkstation Pro (LS-XHL) by Buffalo. Signed-off-by: Michael Walle mich...@walle.cc Cc: Prafulla Wadaskar prafu...@marvell.com Cc: Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de --- v2:

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2] lsxl: add support for lschlv2 and lsxhl

2012-03-02 Thread Michael Walle
This patchset adds support for both the Linkstation Live (LS-CHLv2) and Linkstation Pro (LS-XHL) by Buffalo. Signed-off-by: Michael Walle mich...@walle.cc Cc: Prafulla Wadaskar prafu...@marvell.com Cc: Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de --- v2: - add to buffalo vendor directory instead of Marvell -