Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/2] OMAP/GPMC: speed up NAND read access

2014-07-25 Thread Gupta, Pekon
Hi Daniel, From: Gupta, Pekon Hi Daniel, From: Daniel Mack [mailto:zon...@gmail.com] Resending this since I got no replies on the first version. I also fixed up the commit log of #1. I plan to test this, but there is still a long pending list of patches which for me to test in kernel and

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/2] OMAP/GPMC: speed up NAND read access

2014-06-26 Thread Gupta, Pekon
Hi Daniel, From: Daniel Mack [mailto:zon...@gmail.com] Resending this since I got no replies on the first version. I also fixed up the commit log of #1. I plan to test this, but there is still a long pending list of patches which for me to test in kernel and u-boot. So it might take bit time.

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/2] OMAP/GPMC: speed up NAND read access

2014-06-26 Thread Daniel Mack
Hi, On 06/26/2014 08:08 AM, Gupta, Pekon wrote: From: Daniel Mack [mailto:zon...@gmail.com] Resending this since I got no replies on the first version. I also fixed up the commit log of #1. I plan to test this, but there is still a long pending list of patches which for me to test in

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/2] OMAP/GPMC: speed up NAND read access

2014-06-25 Thread Daniel Mack
Resending this since I got no replies on the first version. I also fixed up the commit log of #1. I spent some time looking into boot times of AM335x platforms. One big improvement I made came with adding support for GPMC prefetch mode, which gave a speed-up of NAND reads of roughly

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/2] OMAP/GPMC: speed up NAND read access

2014-06-25 Thread Tom Rini
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 02:43:31PM +0200, Daniel Mack wrote: Resending this since I got no replies on the first version. I also fixed up the commit log of #1. Sorry, I intended to play with it, but got busy. Can you do a v3 where you also enable this on am335x_evm which is where I assume you

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/2] OMAP/GPMC: speed up NAND read access

2014-06-25 Thread Daniel Mack
Hi Tom, On 06/25/2014 03:00 PM, Tom Rini wrote: On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 02:43:31PM +0200, Daniel Mack wrote: Resending this since I got no replies on the first version. I also fixed up the commit log of #1. Sorry, I intended to play with it, but got busy. No problem. I just don't want it