Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/3] cadence-quadspi: Fix issues with non 32bit aligned accesses

On Tuesday 23 January 2018 03:01 PM, Jagan Teki wrote: [...] > u-boot-spi/master throws few warnings when I build for my platform: > ~/workspace/u-boot:0f520af57c60:~ make distclean;make > k2g_evm_defconfig;make -j4 -s; > > In file included from

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/3] cadence-quadspi: Fix issues with non 32bit aligned accesses

On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 2:56 PM, Simon Goldschmidt wrote: > On 23.01.2018 10:16, Vignesh R wrote: >> >> >> On Tuesday 23 January 2018 02:37 PM, Jagan Teki wrote: >>> >>> On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 2:32 PM, Vignesh R wrote: On

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/3] cadence-quadspi: Fix issues with non 32bit aligned accesses

On 23.01.2018 10:16, Vignesh R wrote: On Tuesday 23 January 2018 02:37 PM, Jagan Teki wrote: On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 2:32 PM, Vignesh R wrote: On Tuesday 23 January 2018 02:15 PM, Jagan Teki wrote: On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 1:42 PM, Simon Goldschmidt

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/3] cadence-quadspi: Fix issues with non 32bit aligned accesses

On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 2:46 PM, Vignesh R wrote: > > > On Tuesday 23 January 2018 02:37 PM, Jagan Teki wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 2:32 PM, Vignesh R wrote: >>> >>> >>> On Tuesday 23 January 2018 02:15 PM, Jagan Teki wrote: On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/3] cadence-quadspi: Fix issues with non 32bit aligned accesses

On Tuesday 23 January 2018 02:37 PM, Jagan Teki wrote: > On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 2:32 PM, Vignesh R wrote: >> >> >> On Tuesday 23 January 2018 02:15 PM, Jagan Teki wrote: >>> On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 1:42 PM, Simon Goldschmidt >>> wrote:

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/3] cadence-quadspi: Fix issues with non 32bit aligned accesses

On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 2:32 PM, Vignesh R wrote: > > > On Tuesday 23 January 2018 02:15 PM, Jagan Teki wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 1:42 PM, Simon Goldschmidt >> wrote: >>> Jagan, >>> >>> >>> the merge window is now less than 1 week for

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/3] cadence-quadspi: Fix issues with non 32bit aligned accesses

On Tuesday 23 January 2018 02:15 PM, Jagan Teki wrote: > On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 1:42 PM, Simon Goldschmidt > wrote: >> Jagan, >> >> >> the merge window is now less than 1 week for 2018.03 if I'm not mistaken. >> Can you apply this, please? > > Can you resend

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/3] cadence-quadspi: Fix issues with non 32bit aligned accesses

On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 1:42 PM, Simon Goldschmidt wrote: > Jagan, > > > the merge window is now less than 1 week for 2018.03 if I'm not mistaken. > Can you apply this, please? Can you resend these on-top of u-boot-spi/master, have few changes on wait_for_bit

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/3] cadence-quadspi: Fix issues with non 32bit aligned accesses

Jagan, the merge window is now less than 1 week for 2018.03 if I'm not mistaken. Can you apply this, please? Thanks, Simon On 15.01.2018 14:47, Jason Rush wrote: On 1/15/2018 6:01 AM, Simon Goldschmidt wrote: Pepperl+Fuchs GmbH, Mannheim Geschaeftsfuehrer/Managing Directors: Dr.-Ing.

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/3] cadence-quadspi: Fix issues with non 32bit aligned accesses

On 1/15/2018 6:01 AM, Simon Goldschmidt wrote: > > Pepperl+Fuchs GmbH, Mannheim > Geschaeftsfuehrer/Managing Directors: Dr.-Ing. Gunther Kegel (Vors./CEO), > Werner Guthier, Mehmet Hatiboglu > Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats/Chairman of the supervisory board: Claus > Michael >

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/3] cadence-quadspi: Fix issues with non 32bit aligned accesses

 Pepperl+Fuchs GmbH, Mannheim Geschaeftsfuehrer/Managing Directors: Dr.-Ing. Gunther Kegel (Vors./CEO), Werner Guthier, Mehmet Hatiboglu Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats/Chairman of the supervisory board: Claus Michael Registergericht/Register Court: AG Mannheim HRB 4713 On 15.01.2018 12:45,

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/3] cadence-quadspi: Fix issues with non 32bit aligned accesses

On 01/15/2018 12:36 PM, Vignesh R wrote: > Marek, > > On 09-Jan-18 6:49 PM, Vignesh R wrote: >> This series reverts use of bounce_buf.c for non-DMA related alignment >> restriction and replaces it with local bounce buffer to handle problems >> with non 32 bit aligned writes on TI platforms. >>

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/3] cadence-quadspi: Fix issues with non 32bit aligned accesses

Marek, On 09-Jan-18 6:49 PM, Vignesh R wrote: > This series reverts use of bounce_buf.c for non-DMA related alignment > restriction and replaces it with local bounce buffer to handle problems > with non 32 bit aligned writes on TI platforms. > Based on top of Jason's series: >

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/3] cadence-quadspi: Fix issues with non 32bit aligned accesses

On 01/10/2018 04:33 PM, Goldschmidt Simon wrote: > On Tue 09/01/18 14:19, Vignesh R wrote: >> This series reverts use of bounce_buf.c for non-DMA related alignment >> restriction >> and replaces it with local bounce buffer to handle problems with non 32 bit >> aligned >> writes on TI platforms.

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/3] cadence-quadspi: Fix issues with non 32bit aligned accesses

On Tue 09/01/18 14:19, Vignesh R wrote: > This series reverts use of bounce_buf.c for non-DMA related alignment > restriction > and replaces it with local bounce buffer to handle problems with non 32 bit > aligned > writes on TI platforms. > Based on top of Jason's series: >

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/3] cadence-quadspi: Fix issues with non 32bit aligned accesses

This series reverts use of bounce_buf.c for non-DMA related alignment restriction and replaces it with local bounce buffer to handle problems with non 32 bit aligned writes on TI platforms. Based on top of Jason's series: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/cover/856431/ Tested on K2G EVM. Goldschmidt