Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 00/11] SF: Migrate to Linux SPI NOR framework

2019-01-21 Thread Stefan Roese
On 21.01.19 18:08, Tom Rini wrote: On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 08:17:31PM +0530, Vignesh R wrote: On 21-Jan-19 5:40 PM, Jagan Teki wrote: On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 5:28 PM Vignesh R wrote: On 14/01/19 8:32 PM, Vignesh R wrote: Hi Jagan, Could you please review v2? If we plan to merge this

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 00/11] SF: Migrate to Linux SPI NOR framework

2019-01-21 Thread Horatiu Vultur
Hi Vignesh, I have done few small tests on Ocelot and Luton boards which have SPI NOR: mx25l25635f and m25p128. I have not seen any issues. So if you want, you can add: Tested-by: Horatiu Vultur The 12/21/2018 12:08, Vignesh R wrote: > U-Boot SPI NOR support (sf layer) is quite outdated as it

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 00/11] SF: Migrate to Linux SPI NOR framework

2019-01-21 Thread Tom Rini
On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 08:17:31PM +0530, Vignesh R wrote: > > > On 21-Jan-19 5:40 PM, Jagan Teki wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 5:28 PM Vignesh R wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >> On 14/01/19 8:32 PM, Vignesh R wrote: > >>> Hi Jagan, > >>> > >>> Could you please review v2? If we plan to merge

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 00/11] SF: Migrate to Linux SPI NOR framework

2019-01-21 Thread Vignesh R
On 21-Jan-19 5:40 PM, Jagan Teki wrote: > On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 5:28 PM Vignesh R wrote: >> >> >> >> On 14/01/19 8:32 PM, Vignesh R wrote: >>> Hi Jagan, >>> >>> Could you please review v2? If we plan to merge this series for >>> v2019.04, we should probably plan to take it a bit early so as

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 00/11] SF: Migrate to Linux SPI NOR framework

2019-01-21 Thread Jagan Teki
On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 5:28 PM Vignesh R wrote: > > > > On 14/01/19 8:32 PM, Vignesh R wrote: > > Hi Jagan, > > > > Could you please review v2? If we plan to merge this series for > > v2019.04, we should probably plan to take it a bit early so as to > > address any regression or fall out in

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 00/11] SF: Migrate to Linux SPI NOR framework

2019-01-21 Thread Vignesh R
On 14/01/19 8:32 PM, Vignesh R wrote: > Hi Jagan, > > Could you please review v2? If we plan to merge this series for > v2019.04, we should probably plan to take it a bit early so as to > address any regression or fall out in time. Thanks! > Gentle ping... Jagan could you review this series?

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 00/11] SF: Migrate to Linux SPI NOR framework

2019-01-14 Thread Tom Rini
On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 08:32:29PM +0530, Vignesh R wrote: > Hi Jagan, > > Could you please review v2? If we plan to merge this series for > v2019.04, we should probably plan to take it a bit early so as to > address any regression or fall out in time. Thanks! Yes, please, thanks! -- Tom

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 00/11] SF: Migrate to Linux SPI NOR framework

2019-01-14 Thread Vignesh R
Hi Jagan, Could you please review v2? If we plan to merge this series for v2019.04, we should probably plan to take it a bit early so as to address any regression or fall out in time. Thanks! Regards Vignesh On 21/12/18 12:08 PM, Vignesh R wrote: > U-Boot SPI NOR support (sf layer) is quite

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 00/11] SF: Migrate to Linux SPI NOR framework

2019-01-09 Thread Vignesh R
On 22/12/18 1:13 PM, Simon Goldschmidt wrote: > Am 21.12.2018 um 14:29 schrieb Simon Goldschmidt: >> Am 21.12.2018 um 12:11 schrieb Vignesh R: >>> Hi Simon, >>> [...] Hi Vignesh, I just did a quick test on this but it fails to boot. I guess this could be a size problem.

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 00/11] SF: Migrate to Linux SPI NOR framework

2018-12-21 Thread Simon Goldschmidt
Am 21.12.2018 um 14:29 schrieb Simon Goldschmidt: Am 21.12.2018 um 12:11 schrieb Vignesh R: Hi Simon, [...] Hi Vignesh, I just did a quick test on this but it fails to boot. I guess this could be a size problem. I guess. SPL_SPI_FLASH_TINY would help with SPL size issue here. Yes, after

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 00/11] SF: Migrate to Linux SPI NOR framework

2018-12-21 Thread Simon Goldschmidt
Am 21.12.2018 um 12:11 schrieb Vignesh R: Hi Simon, [...] Hi Vignesh, I just did a quick test on this but it fails to boot. I guess this could be a size problem. I guess. SPL_SPI_FLASH_TINY would help with SPL size issue here. Yes, after enabling that it works. With the tiny framework, I

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 00/11] SF: Migrate to Linux SPI NOR framework

2018-12-21 Thread Vignesh R
Hi Simon, [...] > > Hi Vignesh, > > I just did a quick test on this but it fails to boot. I guess this could > be a size problem. I guess. SPL_SPI_FLASH_TINY would help with SPL size issue here. > Unfortunately, the socfpga gen5 config does not > correctly check SPL size currently. I'll have

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 00/11] SF: Migrate to Linux SPI NOR framework

2018-12-21 Thread Simon Goldschmidt
Am Fr., 21. Dez. 2018, 07:37 hat Vignesh R geschrieben: > U-Boot SPI NOR support (sf layer) is quite outdated as it does not > support 4 byte addressing opcodes, SFDP table parsing and different types > of > quad mode enable sequences. Many newer flashes no longer support BANK > registers used

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 00/11] SF: Migrate to Linux SPI NOR framework

2018-12-20 Thread Stefan Roese
Hi Vignesh, On 21.12.18 07:38, Vignesh R wrote: U-Boot SPI NOR support (sf layer) is quite outdated as it does not support 4 byte addressing opcodes, SFDP table parsing and different types of quad mode enable sequences. Many newer flashes no longer support BANK registers used by sf layer to a

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 00/11] SF: Migrate to Linux SPI NOR framework

2018-12-20 Thread Vignesh R
U-Boot SPI NOR support (sf layer) is quite outdated as it does not support 4 byte addressing opcodes, SFDP table parsing and different types of quad mode enable sequences. Many newer flashes no longer support BANK registers used by sf layer to a access >16MB space. Also, many SPI controllers have