Hi Simon,
On Wed, 21 Jan 2015 09:12:25 -0700
Simon Glass s...@chromium.org wrote:
ay makes no sense.
Except that I inserted this patch into the series I sent a week ago,
which I want to apply today/tomorrow. So I wanted to limit the scope
Sorry for my late review.
I am interested in this
Hi Masahiro,
On 22 January 2015 at 01:03, Masahiro Yamada yamad...@jp.panasonic.com wrote:
Hi Simon,
On Wed, 21 Jan 2015 09:12:25 -0700
Simon Glass s...@chromium.org wrote:
ay makes no sense.
Except that I inserted this patch into the series I sent a week ago,
which I want to apply
Hi Simon,
2015-01-22 1:12 GMT+09:00 Simon Glass s...@chromium.org:
Hi Bin,
On 21 January 2015 at 03:45, Masahiro Yamada yamad...@jp.panasonic.com
wrote:
Hi Simon,
On Mon, 19 Jan 2015 20:12:30 -0700
Simon Glass s...@chromium.org wrote:
diff --git a/common/cmd_i2c.c
Hi Bin,
On 21 January 2015 at 03:45, Masahiro Yamada yamad...@jp.panasonic.com wrote:
Hi Simon,
On Mon, 19 Jan 2015 20:12:30 -0700
Simon Glass s...@chromium.org wrote:
diff --git a/common/cmd_i2c.c b/common/cmd_i2c.c
index 1e500fb..7c3ad00 100644
--- a/common/cmd_i2c.c
+++
Hi Simon,
On Mon, 19 Jan 2015 20:12:30 -0700
Simon Glass s...@chromium.org wrote:
diff --git a/common/cmd_i2c.c b/common/cmd_i2c.c
index 1e500fb..7c3ad00 100644
--- a/common/cmd_i2c.c
+++ b/common/cmd_i2c.c
@@ -168,7 +168,7 @@ static int i2c_get_cur_bus_chip(uint chip_addr, struct
Rather than assuming that the chip offset length is 1, allow it to be
provided. This allows chips that don't use the default offset length to
be used (at present they are only supported by the command line 'i2c'
command which sets the offset length explicitly).
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass
Hello Simon,
Am 20.01.2015 04:12, schrieb Simon Glass:
Rather than assuming that the chip offset length is 1, allow it to be
provided. This allows chips that don't use the default offset length to
be used (at present they are only supported by the command line 'i2c'
command which sets the
7 matches
Mail list logo