On 12/10/2018 02:00, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Jean-Jacques,
On 11 October 2018 at 06:01, Jean-Jacques Hiblot wrote:
Hi Simon,
thanks for the reviews.
On 11/10/2018 05:13, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Jean-Jacques,
On 5 October 2018 at 10:45, Jean-Jacques Hiblot wrote:
In a non-DM environment,
Hi Jean-Jacques,
On 11 October 2018 at 06:01, Jean-Jacques Hiblot wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> thanks for the reviews.
>
>
>
> On 11/10/2018 05:13, Simon Glass wrote:
>>
>> Hi Jean-Jacques,
>>
>> On 5 October 2018 at 10:45, Jean-Jacques Hiblot wrote:
>>>
>>> In a non-DM environment, it is possible to
Hi Simon,
thanks for the reviews.
On 11/10/2018 05:13, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi Jean-Jacques,
On 5 October 2018 at 10:45, Jean-Jacques Hiblot wrote:
In a non-DM environment, it is possible to test the presence of a chip
using i2c_probe(chip_addr).
dm_i2c_probe_device() brings the same
Hi Jean-Jacques,
On 5 October 2018 at 10:45, Jean-Jacques Hiblot wrote:
> In a non-DM environment, it is possible to test the presence of a chip
> using i2c_probe(chip_addr).
> dm_i2c_probe_device() brings the same functionality with a DM interface.
> The intent is to be able to test the
In a non-DM environment, it is possible to test the presence of a chip
using i2c_probe(chip_addr).
dm_i2c_probe_device() brings the same functionality with a DM interface.
The intent is to be able to test the presence of a chip for the device has
been created with i2c_get_chip_for_busnum(bus_num,
5 matches
Mail list logo