Hi Luca,
[...]
> I removed the checkpatch-related changes: they are now on the tftp
> cleanup patch series that I submitted on saturday, and on top of which
> v3 of the TFTP server will be based.
Thanks for your persistence - it is very much appreciated!
Detlev
--
The proprietary-Unix player
Luca Ceresoli wrote:
> Il 19/04/2011 16:18, Detlev Zundel ha scritto:
>> Hi Luca,
>>
>>> With the upcoming TFTP server implementation, the remote node can be
>>> either a client or a server, so avoid ambiguities.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Luca Ceresoli
>>> Cc: Wolfgang Denk
>>> ---
>>> Changes in v2:
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Monday, April 18, 2011 12:19:51 Luca Ceresoli wrote:
>> With the upcoming TFTP server implementation, the remote node can be
>> either a client or a server, so avoid ambiguities.
> the summary made me worried because i thought you were going to rename the env
> var "serve
Luca Ceresoli wrote:
> Hi Wolfgang,
>
> Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>> Dear Luca Ceresoli,
>>
>> In
>> message<1303143594-5345-4-git-send-email-luca.ceres...@comelit.it>
>> you wrote:
>>> With the upcoming TFTP server implementation, the remote node can be
>>> either a client or a server, so avoid ambi
Hi Wolfgang,
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Luca Ceresoli,
>
> In message<1303143594-5345-4-git-send-email-luca.ceres...@comelit.it> you
> wrote:
>> With the upcoming TFTP server implementation, the remote node can be
>> either a client or a server, so avoid ambiguities.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Luca C
Dear Luca Ceresoli,
In message <1303143594-5345-4-git-send-email-luca.ceres...@comelit.it> you
wrote:
> With the upcoming TFTP server implementation, the remote node can be
> either a client or a server, so avoid ambiguities.
>
> Signed-off-by: Luca Ceresoli
> Cc: Wolfgang Denk
> ---
> Changes
Hi Luca,
> Detlev Zundel wrote:
>>
>> I'll start a new thread to discuss this. Hopefully we then come up with
>> a policy to stick into that wiki page.
>>
>
> Now that the checkpatch policy is much more clear, I started to clean up
> the networking stuff, on top of which the TFTP server sits.
Th
Detlev Zundel wrote:
>
> I'll start a new thread to discuss this. Hopefully we then come up with
> a policy to stick into that wiki page.
>
Now that the checkpatch policy is much more clear, I started to clean up
the networking stuff, on top of which the TFTP server sits.
net/net.c alone counts
On Monday, April 18, 2011 12:19:51 Luca Ceresoli wrote:
> With the upcoming TFTP server implementation, the remote node can be
> either a client or a server, so avoid ambiguities.
the summary made me worried because i thought you were going to rename the env
var "server" to "remote". could you t
Detlev Zundel wrote:
> Hi Luca,
>
>> Il 19/04/2011 16:18, Detlev Zundel ha scritto:
>>> Hi Luca,
>>>
With the upcoming TFTP server implementation, the remote node can be
either a client or a server, so avoid ambiguities.
Signed-off-by: Luca Ceresoli
Cc: Wolfgang Denk
-
Hi Luca,
> Il 19/04/2011 16:18, Detlev Zundel ha scritto:
>> Hi Luca,
>>
>>> With the upcoming TFTP server implementation, the remote node can be
>>> either a client or a server, so avoid ambiguities.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Luca Ceresoli
>>> Cc: Wolfgang Denk
>>> ---
>>> Changes in v2:
>>> - fix
Hi Luca,
> Hi,
>
> just a few e-mails ago along this thread Albert Aribaud wrote:
>
>> My opinion is that you should make sure that at least the code you touch
>> is checkpatch-clean, so yes, you should fix that; but there is no need
>> to submit 'checkpatch-compliance' patches. Just fix the li
Hi,
just a few e-mails ago along this thread Albert Aribaud wrote:
> My opinion is that you should make sure that at least the code you touch
> is checkpatch-clean, so yes, you should fix that; but there is no need
> to submit 'checkpatch-compliance' patches. Just fix the line here so
> that
Hi Luca,
[...]
>> Whitespace fix.
>
> checkpatch again.
Hm, I see. Still, can we have one commit (with "cosmetic" in the
changelog) that silences checkpatch but does not have any functional
changes? We really try hard to separate cosmetic from functional
changes. This makes reviewing (and deb
Il 19/04/2011 16:18, Detlev Zundel ha scritto:
> Hi Luca,
>
>> With the upcoming TFTP server implementation, the remote node can be
>> either a client or a server, so avoid ambiguities.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Luca Ceresoli
>> Cc: Wolfgang Denk
>> ---
>> Changes in v2:
>> - fixed checkpatch issues.
Hi Luca,
> With the upcoming TFTP server implementation, the remote node can be
> either a client or a server, so avoid ambiguities.
>
> Signed-off-by: Luca Ceresoli
> Cc: Wolfgang Denk
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - fixed checkpatch issues.
>
> net/tftp.c | 42 +-
With the upcoming TFTP server implementation, the remote node can be
either a client or a server, so avoid ambiguities.
Signed-off-by: Luca Ceresoli
Cc: Wolfgang Denk
---
Changes in v2:
- fixed checkpatch issues.
net/tftp.c | 42 +-
1 files changed, 2
17 matches
Mail list logo