Hi Mike,
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 3:06 PM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Tuesday 24 January 2012 16:35:00 Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Monday 23 January 2012 01:20:16 Simon Glass wrote:
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Tuesday 10 January 2012 19:45:47
On Monday 23 January 2012 01:20:16 Simon Glass wrote:
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Tuesday 10 January 2012 19:45:47 Simon Glass wrote:
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/sandbox/include/asm/gpio.h
+int sandbox_gpio_get_value(int gp);
why bother with parallel
On Tuesday 24 January 2012 16:35:00 Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Monday 23 January 2012 01:20:16 Simon Glass wrote:
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Tuesday 10 January 2012 19:45:47 Simon Glass wrote:
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/sandbox/include/asm/gpio.h
+int
Hi Mike,
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Tuesday 10 January 2012 19:45:47 Simon Glass wrote:
This provides a way of simulating GPIOs by setting values which are seen
by the normal gpio_get/set_value() calls.
seems to be a desync in types ... all
On Tuesday 10 January 2012 19:45:47 Simon Glass wrote:
This provides a way of simulating GPIOs by setting values which are seen
by the normal gpio_get/set_value() calls.
seems to be a desync in types ... all gpio fields should be unsigned and
not int
--- /dev/null
+++
This provides a way of simulating GPIOs by setting values which are seen
by the normal gpio_get/set_value() calls.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass s...@chromium.org
---
Changes in v2:
- Use generic GPIO command and interface
- Fix gpio_direction_output() to actually set the value
6 matches
Mail list logo
